Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Please retest the official 2.6.26-11 images to verify if they work you: Irrelevant question as this was no bug fix but a workaround. Bastian -- Emotions are alien to me. I'm a scientist. -- Spock, "This Side

Processed: Re: Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 500358 xserver-xorg-core Bug#500358: mach64 stopped working on the Sun Ultra 5 graphics card after upgrade Bug#488669: kernel changes break X on sparc64/pci Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `xserver-xorg-core'. >

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-27 Thread Bastian Blank
reassign 500358 xserver-xorg-core thanks On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:07:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:10:03 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > I fail to see the _kernel_ bug it fixes. I now know that this change > > triggers a bug in the old (considered broken by desig

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-27 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:28:44PM -0600, Jordan Bettis wrote: > > Hi. I just wanted to weigh in and say that I've tried Max's fix on my > Ultra 5 and I can confirm that it works with the X server from lenny. > > Before trying Max's kernel patch I also verified that X.org is > *broken* and unusab

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-24 Thread Jordan Bettis
Hi. I just wanted to weigh in and say that I've tried Max's fix on my Ultra 5 and I can confirm that it works with the X server from lenny. Before trying Max's kernel patch I also verified that X.org is *broken* and unusable using the default kernel. This is true of the X.org server included in L

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:10:03 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > The first patch is fine. The revert is not. > > Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:20:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > The first patch is fine. The revert is not. > Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in > lenny? I fail to see the _kernel_ bug it fixes

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:22:57 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > The first patch is fine. The revert is not. > Even if the revert is the only way to get X to work on those machines in lenny? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
2008/11/11, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Go on and read the discussion of this bug if you really interested why >> these patches differ. > > You want something from us. Also the bugreport reads itself as two > different bugs, which does not make it easier to understand. Bastian, what shou

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:46:24AM +0300, Max Dmitrichenko wrote: > > It is the decision of the maintainer if nothing else matches. > Ok. Who is the maintainer? debian-kernel, represented by whom doing the work. > Go on and read the discussion of this bug if you really interested why > these patc

Bug#500358: PCI infos

2008-11-11 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 500358 moreinfo thanks Please provide lspci -vvnn output of a working and a "broken" kernel. A lspci -t maybe also usefull. Bastian -- "What terrible way to die." "There are no good ways." -- Sulu and Kirk, "That Which Survives", stardate unknown -- To U

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 10:30:38PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > SPARC is a traditionally brand > > architecture. This case > > affects Ultra 5 and may be several other workstation. So if something > > doesn't function > > on one box it doesn't function on a whole gen

Bug#500358: Not only Ultra 5

2008-11-10 Thread Flo
hi, i have a no-name clone with a ATI Rage IIc and it has the same problem (like everything that uses mach64 on this architecture i guess). i can verify the patch, can you please upload a kernel .deb or the raw image somewhere? this one is not a rocket, so building one is ... thank you -Florian

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-10 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
l.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=5769907ade8dda7002b304c03ef9e4ee5c1e0821 > > This is a different patch then > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=102;filename=sparc_fix_for_debian.patch;att=1;bug=500358 > Go on and read the discussion of this b

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-09 Thread Bastian Blank
nel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=5769907ade8dda7002b304c03ef9e4ee5c1e0821 This is a different patch then http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=102;filename=sparc_fix_for_debian.patch;att=1;bug=500358 Bastian -- History tends to exaggerate.

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-09 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
2008/11/9 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> OK, since there was no opposition and there is still no explaination on >> why this bug was donwgraded in the first place I'm upgrading it back to the >> initial severity. > > There is only a small fraction of machines affected, so this is not RC. Th

Processed: Re: Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 500358 important Bug#500358: mach64 stopped working on the Sun Ultra 5 graphics card after upgrade Bug#488669: kernel changes break X on sparc64/pci Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-08 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 500358 important thanks On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 11:54:38PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > As this affects a major part of all SPARC machines, I really think this is > > release > > critical and the bug severity shoul

Bug#500358: Fix found

2008-11-08 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
severity 500358 grave Thanks On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:24:57PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > As this affects a major part of all SPARC machines, I really think this is > release > critical and the bug severity should be upgraded again. If you don't disagree > strongly > I will upgrade it in

Bug#500358:

2008-10-31 Thread Max Dmitrichenko
Proposed patch. Explanations here [1]. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122545873605649&w=2 -- Max diff -uprN linux-source-2.6.26/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c linux-source-2.6.26.pci-fixed/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c --- linux-source-2.6.26/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c 2008-07-14 01:51:29.000