Bug#492721: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: doesn't boot on Via EPIA EK

2008-07-31 Thread Christian Pernegger
> Thanks Christian. This is looking like #464962 Yes it is. Looks like a bunch of "fringe" CPUs got downgraded from a kernel perspective. > running the 486 flavor is probably the best option for your system. Ok. I wonder what that'll do to performance ... it's slow enough as it is. Well, I can a

Bug#492721: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: doesn't boot on Via EPIA EK

2008-07-30 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:24:00PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote: > Ok, did some testing: > 2.6.26-686 [latest snapshot, 11913]: crash on boot > 2.6.24-686 [etch]: crash on boot > 2.6.24-486 [etch]: works > 2.6.18-686 [etch]: works > > Screenshots of the two crashes are attached. Thanks Christ

Bug#492721: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: doesn't boot on Via EPIA EK

2008-07-28 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:07:10PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 > Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.4 > Severity: important > > > The 2.6.24-etchnhalf kernel will not boot at all on my VIA EPIA EK. I > was rather looking forward to being able to use a

Bug#492721: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: doesn't boot on Via EPIA EK

2008-07-28 Thread Christian Pernegger
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.4 Severity: important The 2.6.24-etchnhalf kernel will not boot at all on my VIA EPIA EK. I was rather looking forward to being able to use a stable distro kernel (2.6.18 doesn't support power management on the CPU, which is