Re: Bug#489387: Please do not replace vserver with openvz.

2008-08-13 Thread Mert Dirik
Micah Anderson yazmış: > > There is a working patch available as of yesterday for 2.6.25 and > 2.6.25.2 which fixes both ext4 and xfs. It has had the 'dontuse' flag > removed and is considered pre5. I guess you're mentioning 2.6.26 http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.26.2-vs2.3.0.

Re: Bug#489387: Please do not replace vserver with openvz.

2008-08-12 Thread Micah Anderson
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:42:03PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: >> It appears the plan is to drop vserver in favour of openvz, offering >> openvz as an alternative and perhaps default is a good option, but >> please do not remove vservers, as there are

Bug#489387: Please do not replace vserver with openvz.

2008-08-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:42:03PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > It appears the plan is to drop vserver in favour of openvz, offering > openvz as an alternative and perhaps default is a good option, but > please do not remove vservers, as there are real people who depend on > this feature. No. O

Bug#489387: Please do not replace vserver with openvz.

2008-08-08 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, I have 18 servers running vserver with 900+ instances. This is $10,000+ worth of hardware. I do not have the money to spend on new hardware to easily transition my users to openvz, nor the time to spend on it. It appears the plan is to drop vserver in favour of openvz, offering openvz as an a