On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:35:14PM -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:00:09AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > boring and yes modular kernel are recommended!
> Other people recommend a non-modular kernel, especially if no modules
> are needed. There is no reason not to suppor
merge 445735 433708
tags 445735 patch
thanks
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:00:09AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> bah this is a duplicate bug report.
> boring and yes modular kernel are recommended!
bah, that was a useless reply.
Other people recommend a non-modular kernel, especially if no m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 445735 433708
Bug#433708: initramfs-tools: Wants to have /lib/modules/${version}/ present
when creating initramfs even under kernel without modules support
Bug#445735: image creation fails with a non-modular kernel
Merged 433708 445735.
>
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:17:32PM -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
>
> I compiled a kernel using kernel-package, with CONFIG_MODULES not set
> since this machine is not going to need to load any modules. When
> trying to install the generated .deb, I get the following error:
>
> Executing update-initr
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91b
I compiled a kernel using kernel-package, with CONFIG_MODULES not set
since this machine is not going to need to load any modules. When
trying to install the generated .deb, I get the following error:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.22.9 (3:2.6.22.9.anomie1) ..
5 matches
Mail list logo