On Sunday 01 July 2007, maximilian attems wrote:
> sure you reported the bug and didn't yet paste the relevant lines
> that you found to be screaming.
> otherwise as maintainer you need to pass me a crystal ball :)
Oops, sorry, crystal balls are out of stock.
Its the third message found in here:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 04:13:57PM +0200, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
> On Sunday 01 July 2007, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > please paste aboves output plus:
> > cat /etc/kernel-img.conf
> > dpkg -l lilo grub
> > cat /etc/fstab
>
> I'm Sorry, but what do you mean ? Is this message for the pack
On Sunday 01 July 2007, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> please paste aboves output plus:
> cat /etc/kernel-img.conf
> dpkg -l lilo grub
> cat /etc/fstab
I'm Sorry, but what do you mean ? Is this message for the package maintainer,
or for the
problem reporter ?
Ernest ter Kuile
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:40:13PM +0200, Ernest ter Kuile wrote:
> During installation, the package displays irrelevant and panicky
> information about needed changes in the LILO configuration files
> while grub is the standard debian boot loader.
>
> Detecting if Grub or LILO is the boot loade
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch1
Severity: important
During installation, the package displays irrelevant and panicky
information about needed changes in the LILO configuration files
while grub is the standard debian boot loader.
Detecting if Grub or LILO is the
5 matches
Mail list logo
