On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable
> > solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor,
> > given the number of people using spa
On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable
> solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor,
> given the number of people using sparc32.
Note that this does mean that any packages containing kernel
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:15:45AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The change was commited one month ago and we had test builds since this.
Yes, I should have tested it earlier, sorry about that.
> You said yourself that it changes the abi so it now up to you to decide
> what to do:
> - Remove it
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:54:15PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> The config variable CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, enabled recently for all kernel
> flavours adds over 400K to the size of the compressed image size on
> sparc32. As a result, it does not boot anymore (uncompressed image
> does not fit into the
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc32
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
The config variable CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, enabled recently for all kernel
flavours adds over 400K to the size of the compressed image size on
sparc32. As a result, it does not boot anymore (uncompressed image
does not fi
5 matches
Mail list logo
