Bug#409271: initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not supported for root fs

2014-05-31 Thread Wilfried Klaebe
Hi. ltsp-client-core depends on initramfs (and has hooks into it). dracut conflicts with initramfs. So dracut is not the solution. I'd be happy with NFSv4 without any of the security stuff as I only use it for the LTSP root fs, which is readonly and non-secret anyway. IPv6 would be nice though.

Bug#409271: initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not supported for root fs

2007-02-01 Thread maximilian attems
[ adding klibc ml to cc ] On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:29:52AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > It appears to be largely undocumented, but a review of > /usr/share/initramfs/scripts/nfs shows that this package supports NFSv2 > and v3 only. I don't know why v4 isn't supported. yup, this needs nfs v4

Bug#409271: [klibc] Bug#409271: initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not supported for root fs

2007-02-01 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: [ adding klibc ml to cc ] On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:29:52AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: It appears to be largely undocumented, but a review of /usr/share/initramfs/scripts/nfs shows that this package supports NFSv2 and v3 only. I don't know why v4 isn't supported. yu

Bug#409271: initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not supported for root fs

2007-02-01 Thread John Goerzen
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e Severity: normal It appears to be largely undocumented, but a review of /usr/share/initramfs/scripts/nfs shows that this package supports NFSv2 and v3 only. I don't know why v4 isn't supported. -- Package-specific info: -- /proc/cmdline root=/dev/hda10 ro