On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 16:05 +0100, Matthias Grimm wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:33:35 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Which solution you prefer is up to you but I would be glad if at least
> > > solution #1 could be realised.
> >
> > For now, at least, what pre
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:33:35 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which solution you prefer is up to you but I would be glad if at least
> > solution #1 could be realised.
>
> For now, at least, what prevents you from having all enabled and have
> pbbuttonsd still call PMU_
> This will allow modern systems to be compiled only with
> CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT and a user space daemon does the rest. I hope my
> point could be seen. I would really appreciate if the configuration
> could be cleaned up.
>
> Other solutions could be:
>
> 2. If the sysfs backlight driver is ope
Hi,
I know your guys are very busy and sometimes a email got lost. Normally
I would let it run but this time debian is going to integrate a kernel
from my point of view with a grave bug and they rejected any change
because they can't see any changes in the upstream project. (see debian
bug #407671
4 matches
Mail list logo
