Dear Moritz,
> Can you give us a status update please? Is this fixed upstream
> in the mean time? If not, did you submit your patches and was
> there any feedback?
I believe this issue has been "fixed upstream", as per comment
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406902#29
I guess the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:17:12AM +1000, Paul Szabo wrote:
> On 24 Jul 07 I wrote:
>
> > The patch below (against 2.6.8-16sarge7) seems to solve the problem.
> > ... [patch for fs/exportfs/expfs.c] ...
>
> Seems to me that this has been incorporated (or done) in
> linux-source-2.6.18.dfsg.1-13et
On 24 Jul 07 I wrote:
> The patch below (against 2.6.8-16sarge7) seems to solve the problem.
> ... [patch for fs/exportfs/expfs.c] ...
Seems to me that this has been incorporated (or done) in
linux-source-2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2 .
Earlier, on 20 Jul 07 I wrote:
> ... I noticed what I thought were
The patch below (against 2.6.8-16sarge7) seems to solve the problem.
I now run my machines with both this patch, and also the one I submitted
on 20 Jul. Please include in future versions of the kernel.
Thanks,
Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathemat
Have now tested the "patch" in my previous message: it does not solve
the problem I reported.
Cheers,
Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
I ran some tests today, and it seemed (but not conclusive) that the
problem only occurs when the client is a multi-CPU SMP machine. Looking
at kernel source code, I noticed what I thought were oddities.
Do you think the following "patch" against 2.6.8-16sarge7 code would be
useful? I have not yet
6 matches
Mail list logo
