On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 07:13:41PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:24:33AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > The LSM for BSD secure levels is broken by design and unmaintained.
> > > (CVE-2005-4351 and CVE-2005-4252). It's sched
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:24:33AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > The LSM for BSD secure levels is broken by design and unmaintained.
> > (CVE-2005-4351 and CVE-2005-4252). It's scheduled for removal
> > upstream (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/2/180), but hasn't
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:24:33AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> The LSM for BSD secure levels is broken by design and unmaintained.
> (CVE-2005-4351 and CVE-2005-4252). It's scheduled for removal
> upstream (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/2/180), but hasn't been dropped
> yet in 2.6.18.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:24:33AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> The LSM for BSD secure levels is broken by design and unmaintained.
> (CVE-2005-4351 and CVE-2005-4252). It's scheduled for removal
> upstream (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/2/180), but hasn't been dropped
> yet in 2.6.18.
You hav
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
The LSM for BSD secure levels is broken by design and unmaintained.
(CVE-2005-4351 and CVE-2005-4252). It's scheduled for removal
upstream (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/2/180), but hasn't been dropped
yet in 2.6.18.
While it's not enabled in the binary builds, i
5 matches
Mail list logo