Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:10:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > I am dubious though that the

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:10:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > I am dubious though that the

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:09 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > I am dubious though that the wiki page can easily be modified to > > > look as nicely as the page larry pro

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > I am dubious though that the wiki page can easily be modified to look > as nicely as the page larry provided, but then i am no wiki expert, > so i will let others comment who are more wiki experts (jonas > maybe ?). Beautification of wiki do

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:43:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:39:00 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > I am dubious though that the wiki page can easily be modified to look > > as nicely as the page larry provided, but then i am no wiki expert, > > so i will let others com

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:57:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > your thrown away grepping is the bad start. Maks, please don't pick up a fight with larry so quickly, this is something that you know was coming, which all the

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:57:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm aware of #242866, and I'd be happy to work within > that report. Something about it seems broken, however, > because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into > testing. Is it obvious how to keep this from happening

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread ldoolitt
Maks - On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:48:15AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:17:34PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Policy 2.1 > > how about if you check for duplicate bug reports! > see #242866 for

Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

2006-08-16 Thread Larry Doolittle
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The following 59 files, found in Debian's linux-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz, apparently contain software in binary form, for which Debian has no corresponding source code. Debian policy states that "The program must include source code, a