On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:55:53AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> the major fe is the old evms major nr. afaik evms switched to newer 117.
> no idea if the libdevmapper patch from lilo got updated in debian?
evms have no own major in 2.6 as it uses devmapper and md for the work.
devmapper have
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:55:53AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello ross,
>
> adding the evms maintainer on cc.
Trimming Mark Garey, our sysadmin, from the distribution, as I doubt
he wants the blow-by-blow.
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 19:35 -
hello sesse,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:04:58AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:55:53AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > parse_numeric() is rudimentary lilo support of initramfs-tools.
> > it should work now for most cases of usual block devices.
> > my small tes
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:55:53AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> parse_numeric() is rudimentary lilo support of initramfs-tools.
> it should work now for most cases of usual block devices.
> my small test programm show that it is not able to parse
> correctly "fe" it translates that to 254 inst
hello ross,
adding the evms maintainer on cc.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 19:35 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > I've looked at the initramfs image and tried to trace through
> > execution by inspection (I'm not at the machine). I may be off base,
> > but here's
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 19:35 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I've looked at the initramfs image and tried to trace through
> execution by inspection (I'm not at the machine). I may be off base,
> but here's what I noticed. In short, it looks as if the root
> parameter of /dev/evms/newroot in lilo.conf
6 matches
Mail list logo
