Bug#352765: "no link beat found" on digital alpha-station 255

2006-05-08 Thread Philip Kendall
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:02:20PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:07:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Anyway, since you're running 2.4.27, your experiences with the drivers > > unfortunately don't tell us anything about how things should be structured > > for et

Bug#352765: "no link beat found" on digital alpha-station 255

2006-05-03 Thread Philip Kendall
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:07:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Anyway, since you're running 2.4.27, your experiences with the drivers > unfortunately don't tell us anything about how things should be structured > for etch, which uses a 2.6.15 kernel in the installer with all the bugfixes > an

Bug#352765: "no link beat found" on digital alpha-station 255

2006-05-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote: > > Which kernel version is this with, and what is the PCI ID of your tulip > > interface? > $ uname -a > Linux narn 2.4.27-2-generic #1 Tue Nov 22 17:12:59 UTC 2005 alpha GNU/Linux > narn:pak21:~$ lspci > :00:06.0 SCSI storage co

Bug#352765: "no link beat found" on digital alpha-station 255

2006-05-02 Thread Philip Kendall
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:41:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Phil, > > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:37:02PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:14:50PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote: > > > > Many of the Alphas with builtin old/slow TULIPs give problems with > > > the cu

Bug#352765: "no link beat found" on digital alpha-station 255

2006-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Phil, On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:37:02PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:14:50PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote: > > Many of the Alphas with builtin old/slow TULIPs give problems with > > the current default driver ("de2104x"). I think it's NOT the driver's > > fault, but