On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:02:20PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:07:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, since you're running 2.4.27, your experiences with the drivers
> > unfortunately don't tell us anything about how things should be structured
> > for et
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:07:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Anyway, since you're running 2.4.27, your experiences with the drivers
> unfortunately don't tell us anything about how things should be structured
> for etch, which uses a 2.6.15 kernel in the installer with all the bugfixes
> an
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:42:32PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote:
> > Which kernel version is this with, and what is the PCI ID of your tulip
> > interface?
> $ uname -a
> Linux narn 2.4.27-2-generic #1 Tue Nov 22 17:12:59 UTC 2005 alpha GNU/Linux
> narn:pak21:~$ lspci
> :00:06.0 SCSI storage co
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:41:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:37:02PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:14:50PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
>
> > > Many of the Alphas with builtin old/slow TULIPs give problems with
> > > the cu
Hi Phil,
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:37:02PM +0100, Philip Kendall wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:14:50PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
> > Many of the Alphas with builtin old/slow TULIPs give problems with
> > the current default driver ("de2104x"). I think it's NOT the driver's
> > fault, but
5 matches
Mail list logo