Processed: Re: Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 349765 patch Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 349765 patch thanks On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 01:48:21AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > After changing addr to value, compiles fine; prctl -q runs ok now, prctl > > --unaligned=signal doesn't have any effect. You say that it's going to be > > the prctl() function in the kernel that needs furt

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-27 Thread Kyle McMartin
> After changing addr to value, compiles fine; prctl -q runs ok now, prctl > --unaligned=signal doesn't have any effect. You say that it's going to be > the prctl() function in the kernel that needs further tweaks? > I suspect this is the problem: (linux/prctl.h) # define PR_UNALIGN_NOPRINT

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-27 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:19:55PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > After changing addr to value, compiles fine; prctl -q runs ok now, prctl > --unaligned=signal doesn't have any effect. You say that it's going to be > the prctl() function in the kernel that needs further tweaks? > I'm not sure, I'

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:42:06PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So please make it work; knowing this exists and should be supported, I'm not > > willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinfo instead. :) > > > Bleh.

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-26 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:23:08AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Should be 'value' instead of 'addr', I guess? > Yeah, oops, I just cribbed it from the one I did for parisc for LaMont. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:42:06PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So please make it work; knowing this exists and should be supported, I'm not > > willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinfo instead. :) > Untested,

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-24 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > So please make it work; knowing this exists and should be supported, I'm not > willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinfo instead. :) > Bleh. Untested, as I don't have an alpha. arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c already c

Bug#349765: linux-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: please support the prctl syscall

2006-01-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.14-7 So unaligned traps in kernel logs are a frequent complaint on debian-alpha, and it's a PITA to turn these into real bug reports against the programs responsible because there's no tool in the archive to let you change the kernel handling of the unaligned traps;