On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:09:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:16:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in
> > > -6.
> > > However, we are at -10, and
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:16:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
> > However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Sorry about that, it does indee
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
> However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
Hi Adam,
Sorry about that, it does indeed still seem to be broken in both
2.6.12-10 and linux-patch-debian-2.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 06:11:21PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Well, who told you it was supposed to be fixed, can you point to the svn
> > commit fixing it ?
>
> Did you even read the bug that is mail is a part of?
Nope, i just asked you to check if
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, who told you it was supposed to be fixed, can you point to the svn
> commit fixing it ?
Did you even read the bug that is mail is a part of?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:29:19PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in
> > > -6.
> > > However, we are at -10, and it is s
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
> > However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
> >
> > I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
> However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
>
> I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages, as they require
> pristine source to generate a p
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6.
However, we are at -10, and it is still broken.
I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages, as they require
pristine source to generate a patch against.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
9 matches
Mail list logo
