On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:17:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:44:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:42:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > reopen 310982
> > > > tags 310982 securit
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:44:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:42:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > reopen 310982
> > > tags 310982 security
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut f
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:42:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > reopen 310982
> > tags 310982 security
> > thanks
> >
> > samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present
> > in the release. That being the cas
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 310982
> tags 310982 security
> thanks
>
> samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present
> in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug
> in the kernel instead of
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 310982
> tags 310982 security
> thanks
>
> samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present
> in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug
> in the kernel instead of
reopen 310982
tags 310982 security
thanks
samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present
in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug
in the kernel instead of in smbfs.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 01:44 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:45:23PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:07:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:45:23PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:07:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:07:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Yeah, on second look I s
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Yeah, on second look I see that it can be done in smbmount, and this would
> > be a far more exp
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 18:39 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Yeah, on second look I see that it can be done in smbmount, and this would
> > be a far more expedient
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Yeah, on second look I see that it can be done in smbmount, and this would
> be a far more expedient fix.
You mean something like the patch below ?
(Not tested yet,
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 08:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > reassign 310982 kernel-source-2.4.27
> > thanks
> > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:14:01PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Package: smbfs
> > > Version: 3.0.14a-1
> > > Se
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 08:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 310982 kernel-source-2.4.27
> thanks
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:14:01PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: smbfs
> > Version: 3.0.14a-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: break security on upgrade
>
> > Hello Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 310982 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `smbfs' to `kernel-source-2.4.27'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
reassign 310982 kernel-source-2.4.27
thanks
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:14:01PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: smbfs
> Version: 3.0.14a-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: break security on upgrade
> Hello Debian samba maintainers,
> smbmount does not honour the uid and gid option wit
16 matches
Mail list logo