On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:47:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Can anyone confirm whether this bug still applies to
> the kernel-headers-2.6.11-powerpc in testing, or to the
> linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc in unstable?
Oh, on further notice, the situation in the sarge kernel is different, well
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:47:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Can anyone confirm whether this bug still applies to
> the kernel-headers-2.6.11-powerpc in testing, or to the
> linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc in unstable?
should be fixed in linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, but i will have a look a
Can anyone confirm whether this bug still applies to
the kernel-headers-2.6.11-powerpc in testing, or to the
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc in unstable?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:09:34PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: kernel-build-2.6.8-powerpc
> Version: 2.6.8-12
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to understand your packaging scheme and IMO you do it _wrong_.
>
> a) kernel-build-KVERS on other architectures is a package with commo
Package: kernel-build-2.6.8-powerpc
Version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: grave
Hello,
I tried to understand your packaging scheme and IMO you do it _wrong_.
a) kernel-build-KVERS on other architectures is a package with common
files. Your packages seem to play the role of kernel-headers-KVERS
packg
5 matches
Mail list logo