Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-31 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 05:01 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:50:31PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > If you want to merge those changes into kernel-source-2.4.27 > > (obviously for a future, non-sarge r0 release) please > > feel free to do so. > > AIUI, he's saying that a fix he

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:50:31PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:33:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > > I think the best solution at this point is to build a > > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this c

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-30 Thread Horms
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:33:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I think the best solution at this point is to build a > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare > > a kernel-image along with it, therefore r

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 04:33:02PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > I think the best solution at this point is to build a > > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare > > a kernel-image along with it, therefore r

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-30 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 02:00 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > I think the best solution at this point is to build a > kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (2.4.27-4) that reverts this change and prepare > a kernel-image along with it, therefore requiring no changes to > kernel-source-2.4.27. What do you think? >

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 02:00:13AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 00:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:30 +0900, Horms wrote: > > > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 > > > Version: 2.4.27-10 > > > Severity: important > > > Tags: patch, security, pending > >

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-30 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 00:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:30 +0900, Horms wrote: > > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 > > Version: 2.4.27-10 > > Severity: important > > Tags: patch, security, pending > > > > > > I got this from Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-30 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:30 +0900, Horms wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 > Version: 2.4.27-10 > Severity: important > Tags: patch, security, pending > > > I got this from Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-284.html This is >CA

Bug#308584: kernel-source-2.4.27: missing sysctl slot for ia64 results in local DoS

2005-05-11 Thread Horms
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Version: 2.4.27-10 Severity: important Tags: patch, security, pending I got this from Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-284.html This is CAN-2005-0137 : Linux kernel 2.6 on Itanium (ia64) architectures al