Bug#296700: Suspect this is in 2.6.10 as well

2005-03-15 Thread Horms
For the record, 2.4.27 does appear to be vulnerable to CAN-2005-0204 and a fix has been applied to svn. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296700: Suspect this is in 2.6.10 as well

2005-02-28 Thread Micah Anderson
According the upstream folks, this problem only is a problem with kernels that have been patched with the 4G/4G patch, which is not in the mainline. If Debian does not use that patch, then we can close this out and remove those patches, and I'll make a note of it in the CAN list. Here is the thre

Bug#296700: Suspect this is in 2.6.10 as well

2005-02-24 Thread Horms
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: > I looked over the 2.6.10 changelogs and do not see this being either > fixed, or that particular file being changed. Although I do see that it > has changed slightly, the piece that is replaced in this patch is not > replaced here. A

Bug#296700: Suspect this is in 2.6.10 as well

2005-02-23 Thread Micah Anderson
I looked over the 2.6.10 changelogs and do not see this being either fixed, or that particular file being changed. Although I do see that it has changed slightly, the piece that is replaced in this patch is not replaced here. As a result, I am not able to determine myself if 2.6.10 is also suscepti