Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:15:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > a) do you actually have something mounted on that directory at the time?
>> > b) strace of rmdir, please
>>
>> c) rights to delete are governed by the directory the thing to delete
>>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:15:37AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > a) do you actually have something mounted on that directory at the time?
> > b) strace of rmdir, please
>
> c) rights to delete are governed by the directory the thing to delete
> is in and not by the thing itself. The right
Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:31:09PM -0500, Rehm wrote:
>> Package: kernel
>> Severity: critical
>> Justification: root security hole
>>
>> Extremely insecure. Apparently after having been able to do mounting
>> on a diskimage disk1.img (sued to root under ligh
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:31:09PM -0500, Rehm wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: critical
> Justification: root security hole
>
> Extremely insecure. Apparently after having been able to do mounting
> on a diskimage disk1.img (sued to root under lightweight wm in X- xterm box)
> on a directory
Package: kernel
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Extremely insecure. Apparently after having been able to do mounting
on a diskimage disk1.img (sued to root under lightweight wm in X- xterm box) on
a directory called ./1,
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-02-13 18:22 1
$
5 matches
Mail list logo