On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:43:39AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:24:49PM -0700, J. William Campbell wrote:
> > This bug can easily be produced by creating a zero-length file on the
> > Windows XP system. Attempting to copy this empty file from XP to the
> > Linux system
> > wil
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:24:49PM -0700, J. William Campbell wrote:
> This bug can easily be produced by creating a zero-length file on the
> Windows XP system. Attempting to copy this empty file from XP to the
> Linux system
> will then produce this error. Unfortunately this is not the only way
This bug can easily be produced by creating a zero-length file on the
Windows XP system. Attempting to copy this empty file from XP to the
Linux system
will then produce this error. Unfortunately this is not the only way to
produce the error, but zero-length files seem to always produce the erro
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:54:45AM +0200, Daniel Kabs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is my first comment on bugs.debian.org. I hope this is the
> correct way to add my 5 cent to it.
Yes, indeed it is, thanks for the additional information.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Hello,
this is my first comment on bugs.debian.org. I hope this is the correct way to
add my 5 cent to it.
I've just installed Debian sarge. So far, so good :-)
Mounting a shared folder from a Windows XP (SP2) machine worked
mount -t smb -o username=daniel //javascript/freigabe/win
but copyin
Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:22 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
> driver?
I couldn't reproduce the problem now... it looks like the bug only
happens with a Windows (2000) SMB server because I tried to reproduce
the proble
Unfortunately I cannot reproduce the problem with cifs because I shifted
to 2.6.10.
I use smbfs with this kernel and do not experience any problem. I
believe the bug has been fixed.
Steve Langasek wrote:
Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
driver? It's my im
Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
driver? It's my impression that the smbfs driver is no longer
well-maintained upstream in 2.6, and that the cifs driver is a better
choice. I'm not sure if we should consider this bug release-critical when
there are lots of
8 matches
Mail list logo