On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:31:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 05:00:35PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Horms wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the patch, though the behaviour of the umask still seems
> > > rather odd. I would like to offer an updated
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 05:00:35PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Horms wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patch, though the behaviour of the umask still seems
> > rather odd. I would like to offer an updated patch which I believe
> > makes the umask behave in the expected way.
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Horms wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, though the behaviour of the umask still seems
> rather odd. I would like to offer an updated patch which I believe
> makes the umask behave in the expected way. It also ensures
> that the write_lock bit is read from/written to disk corr
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 05:27:47PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Horms wrote:
>
> > -rw-r--r--
> > after chmod g+w:
> > -rw-rw-rw-
>
> No, this command will do nothing, as only the owner write bit is checked
> and the owner bit is mirrored in the other parts (minus u
Hi,
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Horms wrote:
> -rw-r--r--
> after chmod g+w:
> -rw-rw-rw-
No, this command will do nothing, as only the owner write bit is checked
and the owner bit is mirrored in the other parts (minus umask).
Below is a patch which should fix the original problem.
bye, Roman
Index
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:35:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 05:21:44PM +0200, Siep Kroonenberg wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-6 Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > chmod commands on files on hfs partitions tend to give weird results,
> > e.g.:
> >
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
