Maximilian Attems wrote:
any update on the matter?
did the 2.4.27 fix the dma problem?
--
maks
The system concerned died an horrible death and was replaced with a
system running WBEL (because WBEL was the only realistic installation
choice as all my network installs were done from the decease
any update on the matter?
did the 2.4.27 fix the dma problem?
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:01:13AM +0800, John wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:33:13PM +0800, John wrote:
> >
> >>Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
> >>Version: 2.4.26-2
> >>Severity: important
Hi John,
I have had a closer look into this problem.
Unfortunately I am unable to
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:01:13AM +0800, John wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:33:13PM +0800, John wrote:
> >
> >>Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
> >>Version: 2.4.26-2
> >>Severity: important
> >>
> >>
> >>I've just filed a bug report against 2.6 for this same system; 2.6 doe
Horms wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:33:13PM +0800, John wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
Version: 2.4.26-2
Severity: important
I've just filed a bug report against 2.6 for this same system; 2.6 does
not work on this system, so I have no workaround.
Two questions.
1. Did you turn DMA o
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:33:13PM +0800, John wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
> Version: 2.4.26-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> I've just filed a bug report against 2.6 for this same system; 2.6 does
> not work on this system, so I have no workaround.
Two questions.
1. Did you turn D
Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686
Version: 2.4.26-2
Severity: important
I've just filed a bug report against 2.6 for this same system; 2.6 does
not work on this system, so I have no workaround.
Here is my fully-tuned disk I/O performance:
ns:~# hdparm -t /dev/hda{,}
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered
7 matches
Mail list logo
