Hi,
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040606 02:25]:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Feel free to create such patches, then (instead of demanding this
> > work to be done by others).
> I have no problem and creating the patches that fix these RC bugs. I a
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 01:12:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> I have no problem and creating the patches that fix these RC bugs. I also
> have no problem in uploading an NMU with my patches.
>
Could you point to a list of firmwares which need attention?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> [snip]
> > That silently implies that you hopes a favourable outcome in next GR.
> > If it wouldn't so, we will have anyway heavy new RCs to dial with.
> > At least we have to collect all stuff which ne
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
[snip]
> That silently implies that you hopes a favourable outcome in next GR.
> If it wouldn't so, we will have anyway heavy new RCs to dial with.
> At least we have to collect all stuff which needs cut and be ready.
> Surely removing unuseful sources is due, but that
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > IMHO experimental packages with needed changes should be prepaired
> > regardless the outcome of the new GR, and kept somewhere ready,
> > if the resulting vote was different from expectations, i.e. sarge
> > will be clean on the
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:11:01PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:34:22AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > What's the status with these bugs? There are 5 reported violations of the
> > DFSG, from 65 to 53 days old.
> I thought that the upcoming GR vote would have an effect on
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040603 16:25]:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:02:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040603 13:55]:
> > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:11:01PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > > I thought that the upcoming GR vote would h
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:02:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040603 13:55]:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:11:01PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > I thought that the upcoming GR vote would have an effect on their RC
> > > status. That is the reason why I did
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040603 13:55]:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:11:01PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > I thought that the upcoming GR vote would have an effect on their RC
> > status. That is the reason why I did not act on them while I was still
> > maintaining these packages.
> H
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 07:11:01PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> I thought that the upcoming GR vote would have an effect on their RC
> status. That is the reason why I did not act on them while I was still
> maintaining these packages.
As a volunteer you can always take the decision of not actin
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:34:22AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> What's the status with these bugs? There are 5 reported violations of the
> DFSG, from 65 to 53 days old.
>
> William, you're the current maintainer of the Debian packaged version of
> Linux (well, technicaly not yet, but I'm told
11 matches
Mail list logo
