On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 10:44, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 23:13 +0200, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 15:57, Daniel Gröber
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Luca,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > I want to question w
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 23:13 +0200, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 15:57, Daniel Gröber
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Luca,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > I want to question whether removing these conffiles is a good idea at
> > > > all. I'm p
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 15:57, Daniel Gröber wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > I want to question whether removing these conffiles is a good idea at
> > > all. I'm probably one of the few people that actually muck around in there
> > > but
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1051577 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [iproute2] iproute2:
obsolete conffiles
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1051577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: severity -1 serious
(stop migration until I have time to further fix it)
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 15:56, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > As far as I understand dpkg's conffile machinery should recognize if
> > you changed anythi
Hi Luca,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > I want to question whether removing these conffiles is a good idea at
> > all. I'm probably one of the few people that actually muck around in there
> > but it seems like this is going to break things for any users that do
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> As far as I understand dpkg's conffile machinery should recognize if
> you changed anything, and leave it in place. Upstream moved the
> default ones to /usr, so we just follow what they do.
Actually using rm_conffile is wrong. This
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 13:03, Daniel Gröber wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:32:10AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > After upgrading to 6.5.0-1 adequate shows:
> > >
> > > adequate found packaging bugs
> > > -
> > >
> > > iproute2: obsolete-conffile /etc/
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:32:10AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > After upgrading to 6.5.0-1 adequate shows:
> >
> > adequate found packaging bugs
> > -
> >
> > iproute2: obsolete-conffile /etc/iproute2/rt_tables.d/README
> > iproute2: obsolete-conffile /etc/iproute
Control: found -1 6.5.0-2
On 2023-09-10 00:55 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Package: iproute2
> Version: 6.5.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After upgrading to 6.5.0-1 adequate shows:
>
> adequate found packaging bugs
> -
>
> iproute2: obsolete-conffile /etc/iproute2/rt_t
Processing control commands:
> found -1 6.5.0-2
Bug #1051577 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [iproute2] iproute2:
obsolete conffiles
Marked as found in versions iproute2/6.5.0-2; no longer marked as fixed in
versions iproute2/6.5.0-2 and reopened.
--
1051577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Package: iproute2
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After upgrading to 6.5.0-1 adequate shows:
adequate found packaging bugs
- -
iproute2: obsolete-conffile /etc/iproute2/rt_tables.d/README
iproute2: obsolete-conffile /
12 matches
Mail list logo
