Donald Buczek dixit:
>No, Escaping would break existing programs which parse the line by
>searching for the ')' from the right.
Huh? No!
The format is "(" + string + ") " after all, and only the string
part would get escaped.
The only visible change would be that programs containing a
whitespac
On 12/22/22 1:53 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2022, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
>> /proc never escaped "comm" field of /proc/*/stat.
>
> Yes, that’s precisely the bug.
>
>> To parse /proc/*/stat reliably, search for '(' from the beginning, then
>> for ')' backwards. Everything in bet
2 matches
Mail list logo
