Aha thanks for the clarification, that closing is definitely misleading.
> So far we got only little feedback on the experimental version, so we
were not yet confident to upload it to unstable.
One possible option for feedback is to have it in Sid and let Ubuntu
quickly try it out on non-LTS, the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:13:12PM +0800, Tongliang Liao wrote:
> I'm aware of the exp version, but there're 2 concerns:
>
>1. Deploying from exp repo doesn't sound right for production systems,
>for stability reason of course.
>2. I'm not familiar of changes in nfs-utils. Given t
> I'm not familiar of changes in nfs-utils. Given the major version update and
> the
> fact that both Debian 11/Sid haven't included v2, I guess it's either not
> well-
> tested on Debian, or has breaking changes that most people don't want?
I've been looking at the exp package lately, since I'm
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.3.4-6
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: xksz...@gmail.com
This is was initially handled by RHEL:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406885
To summarize:
- SELinux label can be forwarded to client in NFS 4.2
- Kernel enabled that behavior by def
4 matches
Mail list logo
