Re: [m68k] linux 3.10.1 with initrd

2013-07-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 21:07 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Ben Hutchings dixit: > > >So you should minimise the per-architecture and per-flavour > >configuration. > > Yes, but how? > > (I got rid of the flavours, btw.) > > >> Did nobody script that yet? I can’t believe that. > > > >Script what?

Re: [m68k] linux 3.10.1 with initrd

2013-07-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ben Hutchings dixit: >So you should minimise the per-architecture and per-flavour >configuration. Yes, but how? (I got rid of the flavours, btw.) >> Did nobody script that yet? I can’t believe that. > >Script what? That “minimise” thing. bye, //mirabilos -- "Using Lynx is like wearing a re

Re: [m68k] linux 3.10.1 with initrd

2013-07-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:59 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Ben Hutchings dixit: > > >For myself, I don't much care if non-release architectures have weird > >configurations. > > Right, but it’s still better if every Debian architecture > “feels” similar enough. I’m very much *not* knowledgeable

Re: [m68k] linux 3.10.1 with initrd

2013-07-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ben Hutchings dixit: >For myself, I don't much care if non-release architectures have weird >configurations. Right, but it’s still better if every Debian architecture “feels” similar enough. I’m very much *not* knowledgeable about Linux kernels other than 2.0.3x ;-) so I’d appreciate feedback nev