Re: [Debian] Re: [klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
[ stripping cc's to ml + involved ] On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +0300, Станислав wrote: > 10.02.2011, 19:12, "maximilian attems" : > > have you tested vanilla 2.6.32 from debian, does that work for you? > Sorry, but vanilla kernel does not support OpenVZ features, so I doesn't make > sense

Re: [Debian] Re: [klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread Станислав
10.02.2011, 19:12, "maximilian attems" : >>  Are you talking about the http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1626? > > looks like. Yes, it is the clue. >>  As I see now this was a misunderstanding between our developer and the >>  bug reporter. Affirmative. I beg the OpenVZ developers pardon.

Re: [Debian] Re: [klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:28:36PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > On 02/10/2011 06:02 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > > Kir, Pavel > > > > Any word from you concerning missing nfs fixes that are in pointed patch > > but not in the openvz git? > > Are you talking about the http://bugzilla.openvz.o

Re: [klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread Pavel Emelyanov
On 02/10/2011 06:02 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > Kir, Pavel > > Any word from you concerning missing nfs fixes that are in pointed patch > but not in the openvz git? Are you talking about the http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1626? As I see now this was a misunderstanding between our d

[klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
Kir, Pavel Any word from you concerning missing nfs fixes that are in pointed patch but not in the openvz git? thank you -- maks - Forwarded message from Stanislav Klinkov - Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:55:53 +0300 From: Stanislav Klinkov To: maximilian attems CC: Debian Kernel Team