On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 02:18:36PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther writes:
>
> > Huge ?
>
> Yes, huge. Twice the size of the other patches combined. Twenty
> times if you omit the asfs patch from the others. Talking about the
> asfs patch, any progress getting it accepted
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 02:18:36PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> times if you omit the asfs patch from the others. Talking about the
> asfs patch, any progress getting it accepted upstream?
I've done the first pass of review but haven't now that you remind me
I still have open question of the a
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
> Huge ?
Yes, huge. Twice the size of the other patches combined. Twenty
times if you omit the asfs patch from the others. Talking about the
asfs patch, any progress getting it accepted upstream? Any reason why
it should not be promoted to kernel-source in the meantim
Dear Sven,
> How about including this patch ?
I'd say the author (Derrick? Julien?) should try to get it included
upstream. Beep is not a very high priority.
> BTW, i added both a new uhci fix
Ok.
> and the marvell driver to the svn repo,
It's *huge*. Any reason why it should be powerpc-on
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:22:49PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Dear Sven,
>
> > How about including this patch ?
>
> I'd say the author (Derrick? Julien?) should try to get it included
> upstream. Beep is not a very high priority.
>
> > BTW, i added both a new uhci fix
>
> Ok.
>
> > and
5 matches
Mail list logo
