Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-09-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 05:33 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:50 +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > [...] > > Ok cool. Just to summarize, these seem to be the only drm patches which are > > currently in your tree and not in our 2.6.32-drm33: > > > > [-+] drm/radeon/kms: add additiona

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-31 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:50 +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: [...] > Ok cool. Just to summarize, these seem to be the only drm patches which are > currently in your tree and not in our 2.6.32-drm33: > > [-+] drm/radeon/kms: add additional quirk for Acer rv620 laptop > [-+] drm/i915: fixup pageflip ringbu

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-31 Thread Stefan Bader
On 08/30/2010 06:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:52:10AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: >> On 08/30/2010 02:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 16:26 -0700, Brad Figg wrote: On 08/29/2010 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > [...] > I'm interested in coop

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:08:08PM -0500, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote: > > One thing that I would like to point out is that, there are some > infrastructural changes that have gone into drm since 2.6.33. Many/Most > of the recent patches reference that new infrastructure. OEMs prefers to >

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-30 Thread manoj . iyer
One thing that I would like to point out is that, there are some infrastructural changes that have gone into drm since 2.6.33. Many/Most of the recent patches reference that new infrastructure. OEMs prefers to base on lucid, and they have products that are scheduled to be released based on ne

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:52:10AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 08/30/2010 02:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 16:26 -0700, Brad Figg wrote: > >> On 08/29/2010 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > >>> I'm interested in cooperating in this. > >>> > >>> I have prepared a git

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-30 Thread Stefan Bader
On 08/30/2010 02:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 16:26 -0700, Brad Figg wrote: >> On 08/29/2010 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Steve Conklin wrote: The Lucid kernel consists of the 2.6.32 kernel plus the DRM tree from 2.6.3

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 16:26 -0700, Brad Figg wrote: > On 08/29/2010 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Steve Conklin wrote: > >> The Lucid kernel consists of the 2.6.32 kernel plus the DRM tree from > >> 2.6.33. Now that GregKH has announced the end of stab

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-29 Thread Brad Figg
On 08/29/2010 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Steve Conklin wrote: The Lucid kernel consists of the 2.6.32 kernel plus the DRM tree from 2.6.33. Now that GregKH has announced the end of stable updates for the 2.6.33 kernel, the Ubuntu kernel stable mainte

Re: [RFC] Process for maintaining stable updates for drm for Lucid

2010-08-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Steve Conklin wrote: > The Lucid kernel consists of the 2.6.32 kernel plus the DRM tree from > 2.6.33. Now that GregKH has announced the end of stable updates for the > 2.6.33 kernel, the Ubuntu kernel stable maintenance team has been > discussing the best