Re: [RESEND] 2.6.20/2.6.21

2007-04-13 Thread Csillag Kristof
Hi there! On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:51:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for > most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality. Could someone give me some details about what's wrong with XEN? I w

Re: [RESEND] 2.6.20/2.6.21

2007-04-10 Thread Nate Carlson
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Bastian Blank wrote: I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality. Just curious - has anyone found a solution to get the NVidia drivers working with the new paravirt-enabled 2.6.20 k

Re: [RESEND] 2.6.20/2.6.21

2007-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:51:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for > most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality. yup, sounds cool. > After that we can merge 2.6.21-rc6 and upload it to experimental. i ha

Re: [RESEND] 2.6.20/2.6.21

2007-04-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:51:59PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for > most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality. > > After that we can merge 2.6.21-rc6 and upload it to experimental. Fine wit

[RESEND] 2.6.20/2.6.21

2007-04-09 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks I think we should upload 2.6.20 to unstable ASAP. It seems to work for most of us, except that the xen patch is not of that good quality. After that we can merge 2.6.21-rc6 and upload it to experimental. Bastian -- Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice. -- Kirk,