Re: [Prism54-devel] BE in stock kernel

2004-05-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:34:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > I suggest changing the Maintainer of the kernel pseudo-package to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's fine by me, but the file of pseudo-package maintainers is maintained by ftpmaster. Cheers, -- Colin Watson

Re: [Prism54-devel] BE in stock kernel

2004-05-26 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:34:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > Could we please adopt the [PATCH] tag in subject for submitting patch > > suggestions as in LKML? It helps a lot in ML browsing... > > Is that going to be the canonical way to submit patches? I suggest > changing the Maintainer of t

Re: [Prism54-devel] BE in stock kernel

2004-05-26 Thread Clint Adams
> Could we please adopt the [PATCH] tag in subject for submitting patch > suggestions as in LKML? It helps a lot in ML browsing... Is that going to be the canonical way to submit patches? I suggest changing the Maintainer of the kernel pseudo-package to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then patches could be fi

Re: [Prism54-devel] BE in stock kernel

2004-05-25 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 11:06:34PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > Yes. Margit sent a patch for inclussion on 2.6.6 but it was just a huge > > patch of our changes since our last release. netdev wants individual > Could we please adopt the [PATCH] tag in subject for submitting patch suggestions as

Re: [Prism54-devel] BE in stock kernel

2004-05-23 Thread Clint Adams
> Yes. Margit sent a patch for inclussion on 2.6.6 but it was just a huge > patch of our changes since our last release. netdev wants individual > patches.. so yeah, we have to send small sequential diffs. It'll be a while > before 2.6.7 so it's just a matter of when we get to Getting all these > p