On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 09:43:33PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think you want these too:
>
> af726f21ed8a x86_64, traps: Fix the espfix64 #DF fixup and rewrite it in C
> b645af2d5905 x86_64, traps: Rework bad_iret
>
> I'm attaching backports to 3.2.
>
Thanks Ben. Initially Andy asked to wa
I think you want these too:
af726f21ed8a x86_64, traps: Fix the espfix64 #DF fixup and rewrite it in C
b645af2d5905 x86_64, traps: Rework bad_iret
I'm attaching backports to 3.2.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
From: Andy Lutomirski
On a 32-bit kernel, this has no effect, since there are no IST stacks.
On a 64-bit kernel, #SS can only happen in user code, on a failed iret
to user space, a canonical violation on access via RSP or RBP, or a
genuine stack segment violation in 32-bit kernel code. The firs
From: Andy Lutomirski
On a 32-bit kernel, this has no effect, since there are no IST stacks.
On a 64-bit kernel, #SS can only happen in user code, on a failed iret
to user space, a canonical violation on access via RSP or RBP, or a
genuine stack segment violation in 32-bit kernel code. The firs
4 matches
Mail list logo
