Re: [PATCH] bonding: Don't allow mode change via sysfs with slaves present

2011-11-16 Thread Flavio Leitner
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:02:00 -0500 Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote: > > Le 15/11/2011 21:47, Andy Gospodarek a écrit : > >> Nicolas, > >> > >> I took a look at the ifenslave package for debian more closely and > >> it actually looks lik

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Don't allow mode change via sysfs with slaves present

2011-11-16 Thread Andy Gospodarek
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:02:21PM +0100, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote: > Le 15/11/2011 21:47, Andy Gospodarek a écrit : >> Nicolas, >> >> I took a look at the ifenslave package for debian more closely and it >> actually looks like devices are enslaved last, after mode is set. Can >> you please take

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Don't allow mode change via sysfs with slaves present

2011-11-16 Thread Nicolas de Pesloüan
Le 15/11/2011 21:47, Andy Gospodarek a écrit : Nicolas, I took a look at the ifenslave package for debian more closely and it actually looks like devices are enslaved last, after mode is set. Can you please take a look at this package and confirm what I'm seeing in the 'pre-up' script. It appe