Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:52:34AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:10:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > The patches still needs to be accepted upstream. > > > The patch for qla1280 has been. The othe

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:10:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The patches still needs to be accepted upstream. > > The patch for qla1280 has been. The others, I'll try to push again. > Reread the patch requirements. This even

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:10:16PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The patches still needs to be accepted upstream. > The patch for qla1280 has been. The others, I'll try to push again. Reread the patch requirements. > But this hasn't been a requirement for e.g. the tg3 patch so I don't see > wh

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:10 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:37 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: [...] > > Why is that a global variable? > > This was written by Jaswinder Singh; ask him. ;-) This was clearly wrong given that firmware was loaded in the probe function, not the mod

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:19:48AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * maximilian attems [2009-02-22 10:58]: > > tbm or dannf please add ben to the kernel alioth project. > > Done. cool and thanks. welcome to the team Ben! :) -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:37 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:53:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > --- debian/patches/series/orig-0(revision 12898) > > +++ debian/patches/series/orig-0(working copy) > > @@ -1,10 +1,16 @@ > > -X debian/dfsg/files-1 > > There is a r

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 10:58 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:53:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Here's a patch against > > . > > Still largely untested, I'm afraid. > > > > Ben. > > looks good to me. > > anyway now is a good time to eventually break something. >

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:58:01AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > anyway now is a good time to eventually break something. > do you send in the drm patches to airlied, so that they > land for 2.6.20 ? obviously meant 2.6.30 ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:37:52AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > The patches still needs to be accepted upstream. I've seen nothing on linux-kernel. Bastian -- There's a way out of any cage. -- Captain Christopher Pike, "The Menagerie" ("The Cage"), stardate u

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:53:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > --- debian/patches/series/orig-0 (revision 12898) > +++ debian/patches/series/orig-0 (working copy) > @@ -1,10 +1,16 @@ > -X debian/dfsg/files-1 There is a reason why this was at the beginning. See the old tg3 patches for d

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

* maximilian attems [2009-02-22 10:58]: > tbm or dannf please add ben to the kernel alioth project. Done. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:53:22AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Here's a patch against > . > Still largely untested, I'm afraid. > > Ben. looks good to me. anyway now is a good time to eventually break something. do you send in the drm patches to airlied, so that they land for 2.6.20 ? tbm or

[PATCH] Firmware removal

Here's a patch against . Still largely untested, I'm afraid. Ben. Index: debian/patches/debian/dfsg/files-1 === --- debian/patches/debian/dfsg/files-1 (revision 12898) +++ debian/patches/debian/dfsg/files-1 (working copy) @@ -23,6

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 00:40 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:34:38AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I'm going to post a series of patches that aim to fix the RC bugs > > relating to sourceless firmware. > > Thanks for the work on that, but can you please send all of them t

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On 2008-10-23, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:34:38AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> I'm going to post a series of patches that aim to fix the RC bugs >> relating to sourceless firmware. > > Thanks for the work on that, but can you please send all of them to >

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:34:38AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'm going to post a series of patches that aim to fix the RC bugs > relating to sourceless firmware. Thanks for the work on that, but can you please send all of them to David Woodhouse and let him push them through the firmware tree?

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 00:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Finally, the metadata for sourceless firmware that can be moved to > firmware-nonfree. A "source" package including the added firmware is available at . Ben. signature.asc Des

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

Finally, the metadata for sourceless firmware that can be moved to firmware-nonfree. This excludes firmware for cassini and tehuti, though I have requested useful licences for these. Ben. Index: firmware-nonfree/adaptec/LICENSE ===

Re: [PATCH] Firmware removal

Next, a patch for firmware-nonfree that allows firmware to be read from and installed to subdirectories as expected by some drivers. Ben. Index: firmware-nonfree/debian/bin/gencontrol.py === --- firmware-nonfree/debian/bin/gencontrol