On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 11:42 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:32:52PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:25 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > # initramfs-generators
> > > initramfs-fallback: linux-initramfs-tool
> > > initramfs-tools
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:32:52PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:25 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > # initramfs-generators
> > initramfs-fallback: linux-initramfs-tool
> > initramfs-tools: initramfs-tools (>= 0.99)
> > diff --git a/config/featureset-rt/config
On 21/07/11 16:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Let's start with amd64/amd64, and any other flavours you know people are
interested in. I'm not convinced armel/versatile is useful other than
as proof that it compiles for ARM...
How can i help you?
Thanks
--
Jacobo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:25 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> It's currently enabled and build tested for amd64/amd64 and armel/versatile.
>
> The rt patches applied as provided by Thomas Gleixner with just one
> exception: linux-3.0-rc7.patch. That contains the diff of Linus Torvald's
> tree at th
It's currently enabled and build tested for amd64/amd64 and armel/versatile.
The rt patches applied as provided by Thomas Gleixner with just one
exception: linux-3.0-rc7.patch. That contains the diff of Linus Torvald's
tree at the time of the rt release since the v3.0-rc7 tag. Two changes were
alr
5 matches
Mail list logo