> d-i is currently paying (at least some) attention to amiga, atari,
> q40, *vme*, and mac.
>
> Of those, only amiga seems to be ready for a full switch to 2.6. mac
> works on some hardware.
That's been my impression. Christian has been working on 2.6 for Atari
lately though.
> To my knowledge *v
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Does any m68k subarch still need a 2.4 kernel?
d-i is currently paying (at least some) attention to amiga, atari,
q40, *vme*, and mac.
Of those, only amiga seems to be ready for a full switch to 2.6. mac
works on some hardw
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:51:32PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > running with custom kernels anyway. Atari requires patches not in the
> > kernel packages as I recall.
>
> IIRC 2.4.30 worked pretty much out of the box except for the serial driver
> (which is crucial for networking ATM). On _m
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:47:27AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> To my knowledge *vme* and atari don't have large followings.
True.
[...]
> Although we do have buildds running for those subarchs, I believe they
> are running with custom kernels anyway.
Err, no, ska is running a stock Debian
4 matches
Mail list logo
