Re: )Request should be ignored, linux-2.6 update responsibility and new 2.6.17 plans

2006-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:38:29PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:15:05 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > Notice that, as usual, Frans is being incoherent. He says this now, > > but during months and months has been lecturing the kernel team on > > what we should do or not, d

Re: )Request should be ignored, linux-2.6 update responsibility and new 2.6.17 plans

2006-08-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:15:05 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > Notice that, as usual, Frans is being incoherent. He says this now, > but during months and months has been lecturing the kernel team on > what we should do or not, dismissing the competence of the kernel > team in a patronizing ways. > > He

Re: )Request should be ignored, linux-2.6 update responsibility and new 2.6.17 plans

2006-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:40:07PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Filipus Klutiero a écrit : > > >Hi, > >3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's > >today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch: > > > >>start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing > >> >

)Request should be ignored, linux-2.6 update responsibility and new 2.6.17 plans

2006-08-20 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Filipus Klutiero a écrit : Hi, 3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch: start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing I asked him on #d-kernel precisely what was being done about this but got no answer. I