on so I suppose it is ok to use this mode as enabled.
On 2019-11-16 3:13 a.m., Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:23:09PM -0500, westlake wrote:
When this kernel is used, the latest version of chrome crashes saying it
can't launch because it is not able to create its own sandbox
Package: linux-image-5.2.0-0.bpo.3-rt-amd64-unsigned
Version: 5.2.17-1~bpo10+1
Severity: important
When this kernel is used, the latest version of chrome crashes saying it
can't launch because it is not able to create its own sandbox.
(chrome "Version 78.0.3904.97 (Official Build) (64-bit)")
Package: linux-image-4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned
Version: 4.7.2-1~bpo8+1
Severity: normal
There's a bug with ext4 on the new 4.7 kernel -- rare but it happened
here on an ext4 mountpoint (/home /dev/md1 ext4 rw,relatime,data=ordered)
when a new file is created, the "create time" is not pro
Package: linux-image-4.6.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Version: 4.6.1-1~bpo8+1
Severity: normal
kernels 4.5 and 4.6 breaks qemu-nbd from mapping partitions
qemu-nbd can map partitions from VM images and raw disk images to
/dev/nbdNpM nodes, but proper module options have to be loaded prior so
that qemu-nbd pe
please close this bugreport (discovered this bug should be handled
better by another source -- openvswitch)
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1
Severity: important
A simple test with iptables against Jessie's default kernel fails to
work, but using a custom kernel not from repositories and iptables
works. A simple test is done allowing one match rule, and it can
immedi
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1
Severity: normal
Not sure what is being changed in the kernel going for jessie, but from
what I can tell for two upgrades I had to resort to a newer kernel from
debian's experimental.
I have got two systems here that get the sa
this report is for package maintainers, not clueless idiots.
thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5441201a.2070...@videotron.ca
There's a bug in multiple places.
1) netfilter-persistent/systemd fails
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764950
2) Emailed J.Wiltshire, he never responded. He's responsible for the
netfilter package
3) There is a systemd bug related to the netfilter-persistent package,
filed
Package: linux-image-3.17-rc5-amd64
Version: 3.17~rc5-1~exp1
Severity: normal
hi, can the following be a kernel problem?
I'll explain a bit, it's got to do with the iptables command..
(fwiw, there's a bug with the lsb-functions, 40-systemd which is instead
this can be used to test rules.v4
ipt
Package: linux-image-3.17-rc5-amd64
Version: 3.17~rc5-1~exp1
Severity: normal
hi, can the following be a kernel problem?
I'll explain a bit, it's got to do with the iptables command..
(fwiw, there's a bug with the lsb-functions, 40-systemd which is instead
this can be used to test rules.v4
ipt
thanks I found the culprit, and not because I didn't know what I was
doing.. the output from the macvtaps that I'm using here as network
interfaces was letting traffic from the hypervisor. But the problem
didn't arise due to it not being setup properly but rather a technical
limitation of the c
Package: linux-image-3.16-2-amd64
Version: 3.16.3-2
Severity: important
There's port 138 traffic on a virtual 1:1 ethernet wire and I'm trying
to find out where it's coming from, anyone want to tackle this? :)
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765502
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
If someone tests it without any kernel modules paths (/lib/modules
empty), and with a kernel(not needing an initrd in /boot as well),
apt-get install kernel will fail
I can understand why nobody wants to verify anything here because it
takes time to compile a kernel without "initrd" nor any /l
apt-get install linux-image-3.14-2-amd64 and fails.
I suggest to close the bug because nobody is using a custom kernel. The
scripts are looking for /lib/modules/ where kernel
version=="My unpackaged kernel that has been copied to /boot". And this
is the running kernel.
I already explained w
"WARNING: missing /lib/modules/3.16.1--std-ipv6-64-vps"
^ Already implies the kernel since the first message. I thought the
provided information was replicable enough.
If someone wants to test this out, be my guest.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
(/boot/bzImage-3.16.1--std-ipv6-64 to be more complete, but it
occurs with any kernel that doesn't have modules built externally)
/boot/3.16.1--std-ipv6-64-vps and it doesn't have any modules
external of it(this is by intention to minimize surface attacks on a
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCR
the kernel version is quite irrelevant because it occurs with any custom
kernel that does not have "modules" built outside the kernel. So it
happens for 3.14, 3.15 and 3.16 kernels that don't have any
/lib/modules/ paths needed for them.
The problem is dramatic because I would be using such a
Package: linux-image-3.14-2-amd64
Version: 3.14.15-2
Severity: important
Routing fails when there are macvtaps attached and SNAT/DNAT is used for
routing with a tap device. (The routing being talked about concerns
between eth0's public IP address and tap0 which is not a macvtap device
on eth0.
update: path actually
-> /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy
Not sure if this is a bug or not but it prevents a kernel install from
completing.
My apology for sending report 760126 without a proper subject heading,
thanks mika and everyone revising.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
fwiw I commented-out line "MODULES=dep"
(there's only one line in this file)
/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
and installation(apt-get -f install) was able to complete while making
an initrd image for kernel 3.14-2-amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.116
Severity: important
a booted custom kernel is being used and installing a new kernel package
fails as the initramfs script in /etc/kernel/postinst.d/ fails
apt-get install linux-image-3.14-2-amd64 was issued
, and mkinitramfs also fails
'
mkinitramfs -k
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.116
Severity: important
a booted custom kernel is being used and installing a new kernel package
fails as the initramfs script in /etc/kernel/postinst.d/ fails
apt-get install linux-image-3.14-2-amd64 was issued
, and mkinitramfs also fails
'
mkinitramfs -k
i'd like to verify something if this is not too much of an inconvenience...
I'd just like to have an md5sum or shasum on this very specific kernel
.deb or even if its the kernel image
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-686-pae_3.14.7-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
24 matches
Mail list logo
