On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:58 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> forwarded 619034 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42619
> quit
>
>
> Dear Svante, dear Jonathan,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2012, 19:23 -0600 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
>
> > Svante Signell wro
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 00:37 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Svante,
>
> Some quick answers (just for reference, since atm testing a boot with
> pci=use_crs would be more useful).
>
[...]
> Thanks again. It looks like we are closing in at last.
I have uploaded a dmesg ouput
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 06:47 +, Svante R Signell wrote:
>
> From: Jonathan Nieder [jrnie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 August 2011 22:01
> To: Svante R Signell
> Cc: Paul Menzel; 613...@bugs.debian.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai
>
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 06:47 +, Svante R Signell wrote:
>
> From: Jonathan Nieder [jrnie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 August 2011 22:01
> To: Svante R Signell
> Cc: Paul Menzel; 613...@bugs.debian.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai
>
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 15:18 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
>
> Am Montag, den 15.08.2011, 15:00 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2011, 23:35 +0200 schrieb Svante Signell:
> > > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:27 -0500, Jonathan Nied
clone 633589 -1
reassign -1 qemu-kvm
thanks
Some numbers from sysbench:
srs: sysbench sequential read 2.6.32: 12.97Mb/sec, 2.6.39: 3.38Mb/sec.
srs: sysbench sequential write: 2.6.32: 10.08Mb/sec. 2.6.39: Waited more
than an hour before rebooting!
Version: qemu-kvm 0.14.1+dfsg-2
--
To UNSUBSC
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:27 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:13 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Svante Signell wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Durin
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 04:01 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Next problem:
> > CC arch/x86/vdso/vgetcpu.o
> > CC arch/x86/vdso/vvar.o
> > VDSOarch/x86/vdso/vdso.so.dbg
> > gcc: error: elf_x86_64: No such file or
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 10:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:33 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > $ make deb-pkg; # builds a .deb
>
> Build fails: gcc-4.6, 4.5, 4.4.
> /tmp/ccY6xbIg.s: Error: .size expression for do_hypervisor_callback does
> not e
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:33 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> $ make deb-pkg; # builds a .deb
Build fails: gcc-4.6, 4.5, 4.4.
/tmp/ccY6xbIg.s: Error: .size expression for do_hypervisor_callback does
not evaluate to a constant
gcc-4.2 and 4.1:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find crt1.o: No such file or directo
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 02:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:05 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
..
> > Where can I report upstream?
>
> You already did (alsa-de...@alsa-project.org) and you were requested to
> do a bisection between Linux 2.6.32 and 2.6.37.
found 619034 2.6.37-1
found 619034 2.6.38-1
found 619034 2.6.38-2
found 619034 2.6.39-1
found 619034 2.6.39-2
thanks
Anybody looking into this bug?? I still have to use the 2.6.32-5-amd64
kernel due to this problem. Looks like 2.6.32 complains about an address
space conflict, but at least it boot
I have another AMD-box with HW acceleration via insertion of kvm and
kvm_amd modules. I can confirm that the slowdown is also present on that
box (2.6.32 is blazingly fast compared to 2.6.39!!)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
re it Oops implies that the problem isn't in the sound
> > > > driver but rather in a breakage in a deeper level, either PCI core,
> > > > x86 mm or ACPI/BIOS.
> >
> > The problem is still present with 2.6.39.
> >
---
> Svante, if you have some time, cou
severity 619034 serious
reassign 619034 2.6.38-2
found 2.6.37-1 2.6.38-1 2.6.38-2
retitle 619034 "Boot problem due to PCI core, x86 mm or ACPI/BIOS"
tags 613979 moreinfo
Thanks
The latest kernel booting OK is the one I'm running now: 2.6.32-5-amd64
All later kernels do boot, but with a timeout of
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:12 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:42:57 +0200,
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:13 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
...
> > Anythi
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:42 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:13 +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Code: f4 01 00 00 ef 31 f6 48 89 df e8 15 dd ff ff 85 c0
> > > 0f 88 2b 03 00 00 48 89 ef e8 ee 11 b9 e0 8b 7b 40 e8 9f
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:59 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:25:44 +0200,
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 13:10 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:58:16 +0200,
> > > Svante Signell wrote:
> >
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 13:10 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:58:16 +0200,
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 12:31 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:24:40 +0200,
> > > Svante Signell wrote:
...
>
Trying again to get this message to the alsa-devel list, as recommended
by the Debian maintainer of the kernel, without being subscribed. Does
alsa not have a bug report page?
Booting kernel 2.6.38 hangs at:
During boot of kernel 2.6.38 (and 2.6.37) udev bugs out:
Waiting for /dev to be fully pop
See bug 619034 for more information. According to the /proc/asound/cards
there are no sound cards. It works properly with 2.6.23-5-amd64 though
(and earlier kernels).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-1
Severity: important
During boot of kernel 2.6.38 (and 2.6.37) udev bugs out:
Waiting for /dev to be fully populated
BUG: Unable to handle kernel paging request at c90013cd8000
axz_probe+ ... [snd_hda_intel]
...lots of output lost...
udevadm timeout 180 sec
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 22:33 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:39:26PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >...
Thanks for your clarifying comments (and to Steve Langasek too)
> > What about the (now commented out) fstab entry giving the usbflash the
> >
Hi,
Previously my hard disks were named hda, sda and sdb. Now they are named
sda, sdb and sdc. Is this due to the UUID naming scheme used
in /etc/fstab, /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume
and /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules.
dmesg also shows this difference. Where does it originate??
It
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 13:51 +0100, KwangErn Liew wrote:
> Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i have problems with extremely high IO wait times for some operations
> > like apt-get-update and apt-get upgrade. Even checking the disks with
> > hdparm shows t
sr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 mmx fxsr sse up
bogomips: 3137.89
clflush size: 32
power management:
Thank you for your help,
Svante Signell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
risky! Now I have two ethernet cards for this box, the old one
works perfectly :)
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 11:23 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> New input again: Suddenly both cards are allocated interrupts and
> recognized as eth0, and eth1. Trying to bring up either interfaces give
> the sa
I have a hardware problem somewhere on the motherboard??
Googling a little seems to indicate that the RTNETLINK message comes
from the kernel, right?
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 10:55 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> I think the problem might be related to IRQ and ACPI.
> Attached is a boot log from
Fri, 2007-06-29 at 10:21 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to disturb you on this list, but I need some help and will not
> file a bug report yet and don't know where to get help. After recent
> upgrades on unstable+experimental ethernet does not work any longer. I
he kernels were
_not_ upgraded with the latest upgrade!
Please Cc: me sinve I'm not subscribed.
Thanks,
Svante
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 20:17 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:58 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:52:53PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > #> dpkg -S /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
> > > yaird: /usr/sbin/mkinitr
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:58 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:52:53PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > #> dpkg -S /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
> > yaird: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird
>
> oh please use mkinitramfs, install initramfs-tools,
> t
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 13:57 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:09:38PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > I have also run lilo manually several times, e.g lilo -v shows:
...
> > # Specifies the boot device. This is where Lilo installs its boot
> >
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:30 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:10:50PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:37 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:37 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > I have already listed the visible screen output until the hang. Is there
> > any way to get more information? I thought syslog does not log properly
Severity: Important
> Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
According to the tags set yon need more info: What info do you need??
And why unreproducible, it is very present on my dual CPU celeron box, every
time!
Kernel 2.6.18-3-686 boots OK!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:44 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 412799 normal
> tags 412799 moreinfo, unreproducible
> stop
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:01:49AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Severity: Serious
> > --
> > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PRO
Severity: Serious
--
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject title should read: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 does not boot!
Forwarded Message
> From: Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:26:
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Boot hangs with:
...
Starting balanced_irq
Using IPI No-Shortcut mode
ACPI (supports S0 S4 S5)
Time: tsc clocksource has been installed
Freeing unused kernel memory: 196k freed
Faile
an
USB modem. Of special interest is of course Linux support. Then we can all
drop the 2.4.x kernels, including me .. ;-)
Svante
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
As you all know the hsflinmodem packages are non-free and crippled to
14.4 kbps. Has anybody ported the hsflinmodem-5.03.27 (the latest free
versions) to work for kernels 2.6.x?? In case not, the removal of
kernels 2.4.x is a
removal of
>>> kernels 2.4.x is a very BAD idea I'm using 2.4.x only for the modem
>>> support when on dial-up connections. The computer is a laptop so the HW
>>> is not easily changed. Please...
>>>
>>> Svante
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>
s
>> 2.4.x is a very BAD idea I'm using 2.4.x only for the modem support
>> when on dial-up connections. The computer is a laptop so the HW is not
>> easily changed. Please...
>>
>> Svante
>
> Hi,
>
> According to
> http://www.linuxant.com/driver
As you all know the hsflinmodem packages are non-free and crippled to 14.4
kbps. Has anybody ported the hsflinmodem-5.03.27 (the latest free vesions)
to work for kernels 2.6.x?? In case not, the removal of kernels 2.4.x is a
very BAD idea I'm using 2.4.x only for the modem support when on
dial-
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 12:10 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 20:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > tags 308878 moreinfo
> > thanks
Installing the updated initrd-tools (0.1.79) gives no error in cpio
with /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found:
#> apt-get install
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 20:19 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> tags 308878 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Package: kernel-image
> > Version: 2.6.10-1-686-smp and 2.6.11-1-686-smp
...
> please send in working dmesg of 2.6.8 o
or directory
Not touching initrd symlinks since we are being reinstalled (2.6.10-6)
Not updating image symbolic links since we are being updated (2.6.10-6)
...
Attached is a diff between the configurations files of 2.6.9 and 2.6.10.
Thanks,
--
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- /boot/config-2.
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 13:07 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 289990 normal
> thanks
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686
> > Version: 2.6.8-10
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > This problem was
ith error -16
failed.
Running update-modules...
Loading driver...
Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with
message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'.
done.
Setting default volumes...
--
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
00:1f.5 failed with error -16
failed.
Running update-modules...
Loading driver...
Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with
message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'.
done.
Setting default volumes...
--
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
led with error -16
failed.
Running update-modules...
Loading driver...
Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with
message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'.
done.
Setting default volumes...
--
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with cut an paste from the
debian-kernel mail-archives (I'm not subscribed, so I missed your reply)
Svante
Are you using radeonfb (even statically compiled)?
radeonfb is loaded but unused:
radeonfb 59112 0
Did you try vesa framebuffer?
veasfb is l
Replying to the mail from
Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with cut an paste from the
debian-kernel mail-archives (I'm not subscribed, so I missed your reply)
Svante
Are you using radeonfb (even statically compiled)?
radeonfb is loaded but unused:
radeonfb
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 11:48, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Svante Signell wrote:
> > I have a problem with the 2.6.x, x>4 kernels when booting my Dell
> > Inspiron 4100 laptop. When the console output during boot switches
> > from 24 lines on the screen to a much hig
r I will
change to a 2.6-series kernel too. Advantages would be e.g. to have alsa
and lm-sensors kernel modules included, without having to download them
(2.4.26) or build them (2.4.27).
PS: Please Cc: me since I'm not on the list.
Debian is best,
Svante
56 matches
Mail list logo
