Bug#402676: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000100

2006-12-11 Thread shaulka
Package: linux-source-2.6.18 Version: 2.6.18-7 Severity: normal Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0100 Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: printing eip: Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: c0130adb Dec 12 02:00:22 kernel: *pde = Dec 12 02:00:22

Bug#392126: `kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at': Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?

2006-10-10 Thread shaulka
Package: linux-source-2.6.17 Version: 2.6.17-9 Severity: normal Log has kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at Is this a matter of not using register_netdev? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architectu

Bug#391619: p{re,ost}insts' comments contradict each other.

2006-10-07 Thread shaulka
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.80 Severity: minor Does [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -n "$2" ] refers to an upgrade or to a First time install? postinst cliams that: # Regenerate initramfs on upgrade if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -n "$2" ]; then while in preinst, case "

Bug#389486: typo in comment at initramfs-tools.preinst: inhertic -> inherit

2006-09-25 Thread shaulka
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.80 Severity: minor Tags: patch --- initramfs-tools.preinst 2006-09-19 17:36:29.0 +0300 +++ initramfs-tools.preinst 2006-09-26 02:08:53.0 +0300 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ # First time install. Can we autodetect the RESUME partition? RESUME=$(tail

Hopefully straight forward patch by a newbie. Any comments?

2006-08-29 Thread shaulka
I am clueless with kernel programming. Still, I have came up with the following - hopefully straight forward - patch. Any comments? --- ne.c2006-08-29 14:55:59.0 +0300 +++ linux-source-2.6.17/drivers/net/ne.c2006-08-29 16:02:24.0 +0300 @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ is at

Bug#384889: Don't know the implications of the following

2006-08-27 Thread shaulka
Package: linux-source-2.6.17 Version: 2.6.17-7 Severity: normal I am getting the following messages on stderr while make-kpkging. I don't know what the implications are. There is a DEPMOD=/sbin/depmod in the top Makefile: why, then, do I get the message about depmod bellow? This was ran by