On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 03:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:57:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >> rleigh writes:
&g
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:52:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:40:52PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> > [...]
> >> The fix for this is straightforward: by making initramfs-tools use the
> >> same optio
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 07:56:13PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:40:52PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> [...]
> > The fix for this is straightforward: by making initramfs-tools use the
> > same options as initscripts and any additional user entries in
> >
initscripts so that everything works
> whether you're using /etc/mtab as a file or as a symlink to
> /proc/mounts (as will occur soon; see #620710 and
> http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/util-linux_2.19.1-1.dsc). The
> new mount uses libmount and /run/mount/utab which makes a
>
over to the host from the initramfs so
that read-only root works correctly. This matches up the mount
options with those used by initscripts so that everything works
whether you're using /etc/mtab as a file or as a symlink to
/proc/mounts (as will occur soon; see #620710 and
http://people.debian.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:31:23PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> * rleigh [110510 20:43]:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> >>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.05.2011 11:39, schrieb rleigh:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> >>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 09.05.2011 23:40, schrieb rleigh:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> >> with initscripts 2.88dsf-13.5 from exp and initramfs-tools maks/run
> >> there's a new warning dur
t may still attempt to read it.
As soon as mount switches to a symlink for /etc/mtab, it will never
be out of date.
I'll take a look later tonight.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `&
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
>
> > Testing with initramfs-tools (maks/run) with current unstable shows
> > udev appearing to work correctly with it using /dev/.udev when /run
> > is not present on the hos
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
>
> > Testing with initramfs-tools (maks/run) with current unstable shows
> > udev appearing to work correctly with it using /dev/.udev when /run
> > is not present on the hos
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
>
> > > -mount -t tmpfs -o nodev,noexec,nosuid,mode=0755 none /run
> > > +mount -t tmpfs -o "nosuid,size=20%,mode=0755" tmpfs /run
> Why does /run should not be n
--
This is with udev 168-1. However, I see the above without any changes
to initramfs-tools or initscripts, and this doesn't changes with /run
present in the initramfs or both the initramfs and rootfs, so it's a
separate issue, and so far specific to the VM image.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hen initramfs-tools is updated and initscripts is not.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:38:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:58:07PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> > >
> > > I didn't see a patch in git, so I've attached a simple o
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:58:07PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see a patch in git, so I've attached a simple one here.
> > This creates /run as a tmpfs, and moves the mount to the ro
s a
simple and safe change to make. I've raised the severity due
to the /run transition being dependent on this being fixed.
Many thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GN
18 matches
Mail list logo
