Bug#242866: updated tg3.c patch

2006-08-17 Thread ldoolitt
The most recent tg3.c patch posted here (by Herbert Xu on Tue, 11 May 2004) does not apply cleanly to linux-2.6.17. No surprise, a lot has changed in the last two years. I applied it by hand (it wasn't hard), and I can verify that the result (freshened patch attached) compiles without error. I c

Re: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

2006-08-17 Thread ldoolitt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:06:44PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers, > that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front. I repeat my offer to patch any (well, almost any) of these drivers to use request_firmware(). I need a volunt

Re: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

2006-08-17 Thread ldoolitt
Kyle - On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:41:52PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > No wonder you're so *** enthusiastic about removing support for > hardware. You don't own any of it. How *** convenient. Can I deduce from this that _you_ own some of the affected hardware? If I patch in request_firmw

linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware

2006-08-17 Thread ldoolitt
Maks - On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:05:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > Something about [bug #242866] seems broken, however, > > because RC-buggy linux-2.6 packages keep making it into > > testing. Is it obvious how to keep this from happening, > > without starting a new bug attached to lin

Bug#383403: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware)

2006-08-17 Thread ldoolitt
Maks - On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:48:15AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:17:34PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Policy 2.1 > > how about if you check for duplicate bug reports! > see #242866 for

Re: firmware blobs

2006-08-16 Thread ldoolitt
Sven - On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Ah, it has been argued, that since the driver depends on the firmware to work, > it should then go to contrib, but not stay in main, so moving the whole stuff > to non-free is lightyears easier to handle, and you don't need to d

Re: firmware blobs

2006-08-16 Thread ldoolitt
Sven - On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:00:26PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Thanks for this report, it is nice to see someone actually contributing useful > information instead of just complaining :) Quoting from the Beatles: "You say you want a contribution, well, you know, we're all doing what we can

firmware blobs

2006-08-16 Thread ldoolitt
Kernel team (and lurkers) - Binary-only firmware in the Linux kernel lives on in Debian's anxiety closet. I find 59 instances in linux-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz. Please review my analysis posted at http://doolittle.icarus.com/~larry/fwinventory/2.6.17.html Unless something changes soon, we're lo