Package: linux-base
Version: 4.6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Using argv:
$ linux-version sort 5.8.0-50-generic 5.8.0-50-generic-64k
5.8.0-50-generic
5.8.0-50-generic-64k
Using stdin:
$ cat versions.txt
5.8.0-50-generic
5.8.0-50-generic-64k
$ cat versions.txt | linux-version sort
5.8.0-50-generic
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/32
Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.137
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
configure_networking() will do a `udevadm settle` before trying to configure
an interface. However it is possible for a NIC to appear after the event
queue has settled. This is pretty reproducible with a USB NIC I have.
Ther
Source: linux
Version: 4.9.2-2
Hi! Please enable CONFIG_KEXEC on arm64. The userspace side landed in
unstable yesterday, and I verified that it works (at least in QEMU) w/
a Debian kernel rebuilt w/ CONFIG_KEXEC=y.
-dann
hey,
I've been unable to find time to work on kernel security updates for
some time now and - since I don't see that changing - it is time I
officially retire from the team. DSA, please remove me from the
appropriate groups.
Thanks to Martin & Moritz for helping me get started with my first
DSAs
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:29:13PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 09:08 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Given that, it seems like a good time t
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:01:37PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
> >>>>> "dann" == dann frazier writes:
>
> dann> I've got a zx6000 here, but I'm unable to reproduce. Are we
> dann> using the same versions of firmware/elilo? I'm using the ser
I've got a zx6000 here, but I'm unable to reproduce. Are we using the
same versions of firmware/elilo? I'm using the serial console.
Like Martin, my system is also a Madison - but clocked at 1.3GHz
vs. his 1.4.
EFI Boot Manager ver 1.10 [14.61] Firmware ver 2.31 [4411]
Please select a boot opti
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:04:25AM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there,
>
> Am 01.09.13 23:47, schrieb dann frazier:
> > Source: linux Source-Version: 3.2.46-1+deb7u1
> >
> > We believe that the bug you rep
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:23:52PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 10:36 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > The changelog entry for 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 is closed, though there isn't a
> >
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The changelog entry for 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 is closed, though there isn't a
> tag for this version. What is the update waiting for now?
It was waiting for some more testing, but I finished that
yesterday. DSA should be going out today.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:12:18PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > Security updat
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
> > > branch
> > > into squeeze and upload -48 in time for
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:34:51PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
> > > branch
> > > into squeeze and upload -48 in time for
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:41:03AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 16:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
> > it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
> > pull in so
Apparently because NFS is statically linked (and we only ignore those
ABI changes in the modules). Curious - is there a reason for
statically linking NFS on mips? Perhaps sb1-bcm91250a and
sb1a-bcm91480b need ROOT_NFS more than other architectures, but I
that doesn't explain mipsel.
--
To UNSUBS
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't
>
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:01:54AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Since 3.2.29-1 failed to build on s390 (stupid error on my part, now
> fixed), there needs to be another upload for d-i beta 3.
>
> I would have liked to do that today, but have been busy with other
> things, and I'm going to be trav
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
>
> We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the
>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:35:20AM -0700, Steve Lane wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Is anything happening with this bug e.g. getting the patches into the
> Debian stable kernel package (2.6.32) and a new version pushed out?
> We had another meltdown at the end of August and it would be really
> helpful to h
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 10:09 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:15:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > Is th
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:15:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 05:00 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think we're going to need to do another kernel upload before the point
> > > release to revert a fix that is
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:29:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
> >>chucked at
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote:
> >Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to
> >do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first
> >weekend in march - tha
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:12:11PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:44:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming the technical side still works, I do worry a little that a new
> > DSA three weeks after the announced EOL for security support might
> > confuse pe
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:32:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > > On mar., 2012-01-31 at 11:01 -
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:28:41AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week,
> I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2.
I'm cool w/ that.
-dann
> The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in gen
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:17:16AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think the following versions should be uploaded soon:
>
> stable-proposed-updates: 2.6.32-40
>
> Upstream stable updates 2.6.32.{47,48,49,50,51}, a few other fixes, and
> backport of isci driver.
I can handle this one (if Bastian
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:30:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we finally got target dates for the next point releases of both Lenny
> and Squeeze. Lenny should get 5.0.9 on October 1st; Squeeze will follow
> on October 8th with 6.0.3.
>
> NEW for Lenny will be closed on the weekend of
This was reported by Christian Ohm at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632923
The perf command, provided as part of the Linux kernel source, looks
for and honors configuration settings in ./config. A local user could
obtain elevated privileges by convincing a superuser to run th
Virgo, Benoit,
I've committed a fix for this to our lenny branch. Would either of
you be able to test it? I've posted a 32bit build here:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/524438/
I don't have access to a ME system, but I did smoke test w/ a windows
2008 server & didn't experience any pro
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:19:07PM +0100, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> * dann frazier [2011-07-15 13:24:39-0600]:
> >
> > I'd appreciate it if you could test Arnaud's proposed fix in your
> > configuration to help verify that no other issues remain.
> >
>
tags 633738 + lenny
thanks
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:15:32PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 19:03 +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> > Alexander Clouter writes:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > [ 33.356789] [] (net_assign_generic+0x3c/0xbc) from
> > > [] (ip6_tnl_init_net+0x98/0x19c [i
fyi, got a lot done on this while travelling, but not yet complete -
I've just committed my current set of changes for safe keeping. Once I
finish that up I'll follow-up here w/ a more complete reply to the
patchlist.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:35:06AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:17:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> [...]
> > > 6f396d4a x86, cpu: Fix regression in AMD errata checking code
> >
> > fixes hangs on some K8 systems
>
> I
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-33
Severity: important
2.6.32.39 seems to apply/build fine w/o any ABI changes - here's a
brief review of the changes w/ a squeeze bias:
> dcef84f1 net: fix rds_iovec page count overflow
CVE-2010-3865 (we've had a fix since 2.6.32-31)
> c4f6afb9 net: ax25: fix
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:49:28AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 17:52 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> [...]
> > > bd378dd net: fix rds_iovec page count overflow
> >
> > overflow fix, looks pretty straightforward
>
> but needs a fix-up, whi
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-33
Tags: squeeze
Since we've seen a few regressions w/ longterm updates lately, I thought
I'd use a bug as a way to review each change w/ a Debian-specific
lens.
Here's my initial pass - other reviews welcome..
> eebefbf xfs: zero proper structure size for geome
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:19:32PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:09:37PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Mi,
> > We were wondering if you could help us define the security impact (if
> > any) of your fix for nfsd4_op_flags, commit 5ece3ca upstream
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:33:39AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 00:10 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * dann frazier [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
> >
> > > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> > >
> > > CC
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * dann frazier [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
>
> > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> >
> > CC arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c: In function 'crash_kex
2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c: In function 'crash_kexec_wait_realmode':
arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: 'paca' undeclared (first use in this
function)
arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:176: error: (Each undeclared
We've fixed the powerpc FTBFS, an XFS regression and a few other
issues, so I'll plan to upload -33 tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401
Mi,
We were wondering if you could help us define the security impact (if
any) of your fix for nfsd4_op_flags, commit 5ece3ca upstream. If it
does have a security impact, we can work with MITRE to get a CVE ID
assigned.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
hey Greg,
Apologies if you've already been notifed of this, but the
radio-aimslab fix in 2.6.32.29 introduces a build failures. Looks like
we also need to grab:
commit 2400982a2e8a8e4e95f0a0e1517bbe63cc88038f
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Sun Jan 16 10:09:13 2011 -0300
[media] radio-ai
Just a heads up that I plan to do an upload for stable-security
tomorrow. There's no embargoed issues, and a draft of the advisory is
text is in the kernel-sec repo under dsa-texts/2.6.26-26lenny2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:00:38PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26:54PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > SRM is looking to do another point release soon, so I'd like to go
> > ahead and upload a 2.6.26-27 today or tomorrow. This branch currently
> &
Wouter,
Were you able to verify the fix for this bug?
If it helps, I've posted a test build here that includes this fix:
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/604457/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
SRM is looking to do another point release soon, so I'd like to go
ahead and upload a 2.6.26-27 today or tomorrow. This branch currently
just contains a single change, Ben's fix for #604457. I also plan to
disable econet autoloading there.
I plan to get a security update pushed out soon, but I'd l
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:29:02PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 10:12 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:05:32AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:30 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Ja
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:05:47AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> These are the patches that looked security-relevant, from a fairly quick
> review:
Thanks for the review Ben! Steve, can you assign CVEs for the
following issues?
> [03/49] fuse: verify ioctl retries
> Kernel buffer overflow, but on
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:05:32AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 21:30 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
> > > Please can you test whether aesni-intel loads and works in:
> >
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:57:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 20:41 +0100, cfchris6 wrote:
> > What has to be done until the proposed solution to blacklist the module
> > could
> > be implemented?
> >
> > I do think that it is not very nice to have a big part of those wit
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:22:16AM -0500, Travis Thompson wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-29
> Severity: important
>
> An older explot based off of CVE-2010-3301 still works or works again on
> current amd64 kernel for debian testing.
> http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15023/ this
Package: firmware-netxen
Version: 0.27
Severity: important
A user reported that the 4.0.517 crashes within seconds on this
netxen-based NIC - this is the firmware version we currently ship in
0.27. The user confirmed that 4.0.534 fixes the issue. This version
was recently accepted into the linux-f
In order to get the kernel/d-i stack squared away for 5.0.7, I'd like
to go ahead and upload 2.6.26-26 tomorrow. I had planned to push the
changes in the lenny branch via security (w/ several other queued
security fixes), but I'll need a little more time to get the security
upload ready.
Let me kn
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:40:29PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem
> Version: 2.6.26-25lenny1
>
> On an HP DL165 with nothing connected to the CCISS controller (the
> disks are connected only to the ordinary SATA controller), this kernel
> produces a device nod
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:33:36AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Unlike device or filesystem modules, most protocol modules may be auto-
> loaded on behalf of local users without any special capabilities. This
> means that security vulnerabilities in such protocol modules may be
> exploitable by l
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:52:12PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> #534964 memory cgroup support for linux containers?
> ---
>
> bwh has patch to have cgroup mem functionaly but disabled by default.
> The cost of it has not yet been evaluated. We n
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:52:12PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
[...]
> Automated tests
> ---
>
> This is a pressing task, we should know sooner if the specific
> branch compiles and boots.
>
> waldi shouts for reprepro, sbuild and wannbuild. Build server
> needed between 6-12 hour
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:35:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:40:27PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
> > >>> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
> > >>> Version: 2.6.32-20
> > >>> Severity: grave
> > >>
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:10:09PM -0400, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 21:35 +0100, Mario Kleinsasser wrote:
> > Hello Dann,
> >
> >
> > I've got your message from the list and would like to ask you what
> > this mean? We are massively using OpenVZ for our containers and this
> >
Maks & I discussed this on IRC and drafted the following text which we
believe is ready for inclusion:
Debian 6.0 will be the final Debian release to include Linux kernel
virtualization featuresets outside of mainline. This means that the
OpenVZ and Linux-Vserver featuresets should be considere
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:13:14PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello dann!
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:50:04AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Kees poked me to see if Debian would consider including the NX
> > emulation patch that Ubuntu and Fedora are currently shi
hey,
Kees poked me to see if Debian would consider including the NX
emulation patch that Ubuntu and Fedora are currently shipping. I won't
be able to make Paris this weekend, but I'd like to request that this
get added to the agenda.
Kees, can you provide a reference for the changes?
[CC'ing the
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 02:23:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:42 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 01:03:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > >
> &
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64:
> MacBookPro 7, 1 mcp89 sata link reset fails, no disks detected during install
> process
> Added tag(s) pending.
> >
> End of message, stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
Ben,
Should we include these as
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:48:27PM +0200, Remi Bouhl wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64
> Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
> Severity: important
>
>
> I am using a Sun Fire V100 with Debian Lenny. It was OK for a few weeks, then
> suddenly it was not possible to access it from SSH: connexion
fyi, messages #27, #32 and #37 refer to an issue unrelated to this bug
report. Please disregard.
Suporte,
Please file a separate bug for the issue you are seeing if you wish
to continue seeking a fix.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 04:03:49PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686
> Version: 2.6.32-24
>
> I am experiencing various problems with I/O of domU's and dom0 choking when
> using drbd-backed Xen VMs.
>
> I saw this message on console after a failed attempt to reboot
... and here's the missing attachment.
diff -urpN linux-source-2.6.32.orig/drivers/net/bnx2.c linux-source-2.6.32/drivers/net/bnx2.c
--- linux-source-2.6.32.orig/drivers/net/bnx2.c 2010-09-29 18:03:41.0 -0600
+++ linux-source-2.6.32/drivers/net/bnx2.c 2010-10-07 19:56:35.0 -0600
@@
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:32:18PM -0300, Suporte REMO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the last lenny-backports kernel on a HP ProLiant ML350 G5 and have
> similar problem, but my system doesn't crach, only I see many errors in log
> (in annex).
>
> ii linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd642.6.32-23~bpo5
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:51:16PM -0400, Jon wrote:
>
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-23
> Justification: root security hole
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
>
> The changelog says the CVE-2010-3301 was fixed in this update:
> * x86-64, compat (CVE-2010-3301):
> - Retruncate
Tue Aug 31 11:17:26 UTC 2010 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
You need to also update linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 and reboot.
With both packages at version 2.6.26-25lenny1, I have no problems
loading the xfs module.
Can you verify this works for you?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:48:22AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:19 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
> > Le 14 sept. 10 à 01:11, Thibaut VARÈNE a écrit :
> >
> > > Le 14 sept. 10 à 00:09, dann frazier a écrit :
> > >
> > >> On S
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
> Version: 2.6.32-20
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders system unusable
>
>
> System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9.
> Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:20 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'd like to propose we add support for unified firmware images for
> > netxen nics for squeeze.
> >
> > HP ships servers with netxen cont
a 100644
--- a/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog
+++ b/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ linux-2.6 (2.6.32-22) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Bastian Blank ]
* Use Breaks instead of Conflicts.
+ [ dann frazier ]
+ * netxen_nic: add support for loading unified firmware images
+
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:58:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 11:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 11:00 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:57 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 30,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:22:23AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> hey Ian,
> I haven't seen any reports of xen problems w/ the latest lenny DSA
> that added the guard page code. I looked at backporting the 3 patches
> from Linus - but the mlock patch touches code that didn't
hey Ian,
I haven't seen any reports of xen problems w/ the latest lenny DSA
that added the guard page code. I looked at backporting the 3 patches
from Linus - but the mlock patch touches code that didn't exist in
.26, so I'm wondering if that patch is just not needed.
--
dann f
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:13:00PM -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
> After applying the latest kernel package, all of my VMs started just fine as
> well. All i386.
Well, this is good news I suppose.. personally I'd rather have
something 100% reproducing than intermittently failing :(
--
d
nd
> through google...
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> [0] https://launchpad.net/~chogydan/+archive/ppa
> [1] http://users.on.net/~ckolivas/kernel/
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/424927 see
> the linux-rename patch
>
>
--
dann frazier
--
To UN
I was able to easily reproduce it by running 'make check'. The first
test case (gcore) reliably fails with either a system hang or an MCA.
Bisect shows that it was introduced by the following commit:
62eede62dafb4a6633eae7ffbeb34c60dba5e7b1 is the first bad commit
commit 62eede62dafb4a6633eae
The kernel in proposed-updates (2.6.26-23) includes a couple of
security fixes for the gfs2 filesystem. I've performed some smoke
testing in a VM, but I'm looking for users who might have actual
(non-production) clusters to do some pre-release testing.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:53:37PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> > 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of
> > the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source p
SRM is wanting to do a 5.0.5 later this month, so I'd like to get a
new upload into p-u. I'll plan to do this on Saturday - please
let me know if you need more time for something.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:30:45PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On sekmadienis 06 Bir??elis 2010 04:01:23 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > On penktadienis 04 Bir??elis 2010 08:21:06 dann frazier wrote:
> > > > My case and my analysis talked about UP ke
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:44:55PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:21 AM, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:03:07AM +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> >> Modestas Vainius wrote:
> >>>> Note that Debian's buildds run
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:03:07AM +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> Modestas Vainius wrote:
>>> Note that Debian's buildds run a UP kernel, so as soon as those fixes
>>> go upstream we can pull them in. Thanks for all your work here!
>>>
>>
>> Well, as long as this is unfixed or at least "common", I do
the cache victim
> replacement, although the cause isn't clear. I did find recently
> that the cache prefetch in copy_user_page_asm extends to the line
> beyond the end of the page, but fixing this doesn't resolve the problem.
>
> I am still experimenting with using equivalen
[Please keep the bug # in the CC]
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for the report. I don't see anything in -22 that looks like it
> > would've affected your setup, but in -22lenny1 there is a security fix
> > for the r8169 driver. Would you mind
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> I get no DHCP offers on the r8169 device since the upgrade to 2.6.26-22lenny1.
>
> Reverting to 2.6.26-22 does not fix the problem.
>
> Reverting to
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2010 schrieb dann frazier:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
> > > > I haven't been able to reproduce this issue on my systems, for
> > > >
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:52:34AM +0200, Werner Opriel wrote:
> > I haven't been able to reproduce this issue on my systems, for
> > whatever reason. Would you be able to verify that this build fixes it
> > for you?
> > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/573071/
> >
>
> Sorry, i didn't mention
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:12:54AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 21:56 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 16:42 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Source: linux-2.6
> > > Version: 2.6.32-12
> > > Severity: serious
>
v/sda2
root=UUID=170d52c1-c568-4bad-aass-be4248ad1af4
read-only
initrd=/initrd.img.old
(Now to reboot, to make sure it actually works...)
--
dann frazier
Index: debian/linux-base.postinst
===
--- debian/linux-base.po
1 - 100 of 1291 matches
Mail list logo
