Bug#1089521: linux-image-6.12.3-amd64 fails to boot due to Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 error

m that? Thanks for checking. I've been running 6.12.5-1 successfully for the past few days. Thanks! Antoine

Bug#1089521: linux-image-6.12.3-amd64 fails to boot due to Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 error

On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:18:50 +0100 Jan Binder wrote: > Thanks for looking into this, disabling the camera works as a stopgap measure Thanks for the replies and pointers to the fix. I'll stay on 6.11 until the next 6.12 image is made available. Antoine

Bug#1089521: linux-image-6.12.3-amd64 fails to boot due to Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 error

Package: src:linux Version: 6.12.3-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system X-Debbugs-Cc: anto...@cellerier.net Dear Maintainer, linux-image-6.12.3-amd64 fails to boot. The following kernel messages are likely the relevant bits - appologies if I'm getting them wrong, I'm unfami

Bug#1081546: new "GPU HANG: ecode 12:1:85dffdfb, in Renderer" regression in i915 driver since 6.10 kernel upgrade

The same fellow DD who suggested filing this bug helpfully found what seems to be a similar issue: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/7549 ... except that bug report is much older, and seems to apply to 5.x kernels. I didn't have that issue back then, nor in 6.9, so I don't t

Bug#1081546: new "GPU HANG: ecode 12:1:85dffdfb, in Renderer" regression in i915 driver since 6.10 kernel upgrade

Package: src:linux Version: 6.10.6-1~bpo12+1 Severity: important Hi! I have recently upgraded my kernel, through bookworm backports, from 6.9.7-1~bpo12+1 to 6.10.6-1~bpo12+1, and since then I'm getting weird GPU bugs. This manifests itself in a few different ways: Firefox can't render PDFs corre

Bug#1061521: + XPS 13 9343

led + as a side note, hibernate doesn't trigger any issue (before getting informed of and testing `i8042.dumbkbd=1`) I had attached logs before/after suspend against 6.6.11 and 6.6.13 : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061521#30 I remain at your disposal for any further infos/testing best regards, Antoine

Bug#1061521: linux-image-6.6.13-amd64: 6.6.13-1 no more keyboard resuming from suspend

On 1/25/24 22:08, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Is this a regression from 6.6.11-1 Yes When you resume from suspend, do you get anything logged in the kernel log, can you attach it here? As it was mixed with other upgrades from testing (libc6, grub, polkit mainly), for now I just rolled bac

Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

Another thing I should mention is that I accidentally (I swear) ended up in memtest86 during some kernel switching tests, and figured I would let that run. It found about a dozen errors in 10-20 minutes testing, so there's also that: it could be a problem with the RAM. That said, those are new mod

Bug#928189: Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

On 2021-05-03 20:44:31, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2021-05-03 20:27:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > [...] > >> Interestingly, it seems that the machine indeed doesn't go to sleep: it >> loops over a failure to sleep and fills up syslog with errors as long as &g

Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

On 2021-05-03 20:27:26, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] > Interestingly, it seems that the machine indeed doesn't go to sleep: it > loops over a failure to sleep and fills up syslog with errors as long as > it's trying to sleep, pretty catastrophic, from a battery usage > per

Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

On 2021-05-03 07:37:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: found -1 5.10.24-1 > > Hi Antoine, > > On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> > Hi Antoine >> > >> > O

Bug#928189: Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

On 2021-05-03 07:37:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: found -1 5.10.24-1 > > Hi Antoine, > > On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> > Hi Antoine >> > >> > O

Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

On 2021-05-01 07:59:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Antoine > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:34:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> On 2021-04-30 21:04:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >> > >> > Hi Tollef, Antoine, &g

Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

On 2021-04-30 21:04:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hi Tollef, Antoine, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:20:22PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> Control: forcemerge 922666 928189 >> Control: severity 922666 important >> Contr

Bug#898446: Please reconsider enabling the user namespaces by default

On 2020-10-22 22:55:33, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 05:21:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 03:09:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > I don't think we should keep patching in >> > kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone forever, so the documented

Bug#969350: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64: Kernel regularly crashes - general protection fault in the network stack

ep you informed if a crash is occurring. Antoine signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#969350: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64: Kernel regularly crashes - general protection fault in the network stack

Package: src:linux Version: 4.19.132-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I am experiencing regular kernel crashes with my system. The crashes seems a bit random and linked to limited activity. Looking at the backtrace, it seems to be coming from the network stack (bridge netfilter?). I have indee

Bug#922666: confirmed bug report

Control: forcemerge 922666 928189 Control: severity 922666 important Control: tags 922666 +patch +confirmed I also see a regression with touchpads and trackpoint on a Thinkpad E431 after upgrading from Debian stretch to buster. My research indicates this is a kernel regression, as yet to be fixed.

Bug#860264: similar bug with sshfs, maybe in systemd/ifupdown

On 2019-01-29 21:32:24, Gabriel Filion wrote: > Hi there, > > On 2019-01-29 9:26 p.m., Antoine Beaupre wrote: >> We'd need an easier way to reproduce this however. Has anyone worked on >> getting some virtual machine images up to try and orchestrate a >> reproduc

Bug#860264: similar bug with sshfs, maybe in systemd/ifupdown

I still need to reproduce this in a normal Debian install, but I have had similar problems than this with sshfs, in a OSMC (Debian derivative) install: https://discourse.osmc.tv/t/how-to-sshfs-tutorial/77852/11 There's an easy workaround for sshfs: the `delay_connect` option delays network operat

Bug#904441: Same problem with Asus Zenbook

k_mq=0" to the boot parameters in grub works around the problem for now, thanks for suggesting this! Best, -- Antoine Amarilli signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#889098: enforce fs.protected_hardlinks in sysctl.d by default

On 2018-02-03 10:54:18, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> > There are, however, people *not* running Debian-built kernels, and >> > sometimes for good reasons. This

Re: enforce fs.protected_hardlinks in sysctl.d by default

On 2018-02-02 21:25:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> There are, however, people *not* running Debian-built kernels, and >> sometimes for good reasons. This is a configuration that we should >> still support. > > Is it supported, but it's als

enforce fs.protected_hardlinks in sysctl.d by default

Control: retitle 889098 enforce fs.protected_hardlinks in sysctl.d by default Package: procps Version: 2:3.3.12-3 Severity: normal Tags: security Following the disclosure of CVE-2017-18078, there was an elaborate discussion on the #debian-devel and #debian-security IRC channels regarding the scop

Bug#889098: (no subject)

Package: procps Version: 2:3.3.12-3 Severity: normal Tags: security Following the disclosure of CVE-2017-18078, there was an elaborate discussion on the #debian-devel and #debian-security IRC channels regarding the scope of the vulnerability. It was then realized that the impact of this was broade

Bug#559296: nfs-utils updated to 1.3.4-1, please check your bug #559296

This bug can be closed. I no longer have the setup and won't be able to produce any additional information. On 15 December 2016 at 14:15, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Thanks for providing a bug report for nfs-utils. > https://bugs.debian.org/559296 > > There are over 100 open bugs[1] in the nfs-util

Bug#810896: Workaround

s, but still it probably means that the kernel version of the driver has a problem. -- Antoine Amarilli signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#814648: linux kernel backports broken

Also, it seems impossible to rebuild the backport from source: [1060]anarcat@angela:dist$ sudo DIST=jessie ARCH=amd64 cowbuilder --build linux_4.5.4-1~bpo8+1.dsc -> Copying COW directory forking: rm -rf /var/cache/pbuilder/build//cow.9542 forking: cp -al /var/cache/pbuilder/base-jessie-amd

Bug#814648: linux kernel backports broken

Control: found -1 4.5.4-1~bpo8+1 Hi, I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the linux kernel backport. cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 »: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type The initrd is simply not in the .deb: [1043]anarcat@angel

Bug#814648: initrd missing from backport build (Failed to copy /boot/initrd.img-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 to /initrd.img)

Package: linux-image-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 Version: 4.3.3-7~bpo8+1 Severity: normal This version of the backport seems to fail to install properly: $ sudo apt install -t jessie-backports linux-image-4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information

Bug#810896: Further info

I should also point out that similar problems with the driver were reported earlier, for instance <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765685> -- Antoine Amarilli signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#810896: linux-image-4.3.0-1-amd64: crashes when using eduroam wifi with driver rtl8723au

net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1227996>. Thanks! -- Antoine Amarilli -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 4.3.0-1-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 5.3.1 20160101 (Debian 5.3.1-5) ) #1 SMP Debian 4.3.3-5 (2016-01-04) ** Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlin

Bug#776816: firmware-realtek: fails to connect after a few suspends (or some uptime?)

On 2015-02-28 18:08:50, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: notfixed -1 0.36+wheezy.1 > > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 23:25 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> Control: severity -1 grave >> Control: fixed -1 0.36+wheezy.1 >> >> I am now pre

Bug#776816: Acknowledgement (firmware-realtek: fails to connect after a few suspends (or some uptime?))

Control: severity -1 grave Control: fixed -1 0.36+wheezy.1 I am now pretty sure this is a bug, a regression, even, in the realtek firmware. I downgraded to the wheezy version 4 days ago, and problems went away (hence the "fixed" above). Now that I upgraded again, problems are back. Since this is

Bug#776816: firmware-realtek: fails to connect after a few suspends (or some uptime?)

Package: firmware-realtek Version: 0.43 Severity: normal I started seeing this behavior after the upgrade from wheezy to jessie. I am not sure it's directly related to the firmware, because I upgraded it shortly before the upgrade. This is the history of upgrades, in reverse order: /var/log/dpkg.

Bug#771045: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: System randomly freezes using Kernel 3.16 and radeon)

It seems like the bug was already reported in mesa: Otherwise, I confirm that I have been running with Mesa 10.3.4 for two weeks on the machine that used to crash occasionally, and

Bug#771045: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: System randomly freezes using Kernel 3.16 and radeon)

I have rebuilt and installed Mesa version 10.3.4 (for amd64 and i386) which includes a patch <http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/36714/> that is supposed to help. I will post back in 2 weeks to say whether I still got a crash or not with this newer version. -- Antoine Amarilli

Bug#771045: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: System randomly freezes using Kernel 3.16 and radeon)

I am also affected by this bug. I attached what seems to be the relevant part of syslog when the bug occurs. I don't know how to reproduce the bug, but it tends to crash my computer about every week. It tends to trigger more often when playing video or using Skype. The machine freezes and the scree

Bug#693942: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: regression / high load confirmed after wheezy upgrade

On 2014-11-20 13:23:03, Fran Rodríguez wrote: > Hi, > > How about this?¿ is it solved?¿ Not that I know of. A. -- They say that time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself. - Andy Warhol pgpy9HDsXsGrf.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#765309: fails to play video since at least 3.14

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Control: fixed -1 3.16.5-1 On 2014-10-13 21:28:11, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The latter seems to say that this is fixed in 3.16.4. This may be the fix: >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/18/712 > [...] > > So please test version 3.16.5-1 from unstable. Ah. I missed that r

Bug#765309: Acknowledgement (fails to play video since at least 3.14)

Forgot to mention that things seem to work in XBMC, and using -vo x11 in mplayer works around the issue, probably for similar reasons. A. -- L'art n'est pas un bureau d'anthropométrie. - Léo Ferré, "Préface" pgpoTMxg7LkFH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#765309: fails to play video since at least 3.14

Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.3-2 Severity: important For a few weeks, I haven't been able to play any videos in jessie. This happened during one of the latest upgrades, although it's hard for me to pinpoint exactly when. I also doubt it's directly connected to a xorg upgrade, since there was

Bug#693942: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: regression / high load confirmed after wheezy upgrade

g SSD drives, and so is the server I previously mentionned in my report (ceres). A. -- Antoine Beaupré +++ Réseau Koumbit Networks +++ +1.514.387.6262 #208 pgpSTI_3RnqsS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#701744: fix also confirmed here

We have two machines that are identical here. I had the bug reproduced fairly reliably on both machines regularly, last week it happened exactly at the same time. I installed the squeeze4~ijc0 kernel on one of them this weekend, and today only the one without the kernel failed. In other words, th

Bug#696182: linux-image-3.2.0-4-versatile: Module i2c-versatile is missing

Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.32-1 Severity: normal Per subject. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121217170729.5959.32735.reportbug@debian

Bug#687456: btrfs: Oops when adding a device on a degraded raid1 filesystem

} new_device->bdev = NULL; new_device->writeable = 0; new_device->in_fs_metadata = 0; Antoine signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#674907: shifts the clock by 50 minutes unexplicably under a Xen dom0

On 2012-10-01, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Mauro wrote: > >> The shift time happens also in dom0 not only in domUs. > > Thanks. > > Just gathering information: some references: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.user/75486 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.user/655

Bug#674907: severity

On 2012-10-01, Mauro wrote: > The shift time happens also in dom0 not only in domUs. That is correct. -- Le pouvoir n'est pas à conquérir, il est à détruire - Jean-François Brient, de la servitude moderne pgpfZEzl94epH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#687456: btrfs: Oops when adding a device on a degraded raid1 filesystem

tags 687456 patch thanks This bug has been fixed by this commit commit 99f5944b8477914406173b47b4f261356286730b Btrfs: do not strdup non existent strings This is available in 3.6.0-rc5. Can this patch be cherry-picked? Antoine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ

Bug#687456: btrfs: Oops when adding a device on a degraded raid1 filesystem

/dev/vdc (-d flag added). Nevertheless, we still have a condition where we got a kernel Oops where we should not so I am leaving the bug open but with a "normal" severity. Antoine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#687456: btrfs: Oops when adding a device on a degraded raid1 filesystem

ne cannot recover a situation when 1 drive is lost in a RAID1 arrangement. Antoine -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 3.2.0-3-amd64 (Debian 3.2.23-1) (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-8) ) #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 ** Command line: BOOT_IMA

Bug#645055: realtek 8188CE ad-hoc mode not supported

gt; > Hmm. Maybe the change_interface operation is only needed to change > type/mode while the interface is up. > > Antoine, did you bring the interface down before setting its mode? Crap. No, I didn't. And now it works if I bring it down first. Oh well, I guess I just made a lot of

Bug#645055: realtek 8188CE ad-hoc mode not supported

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:24:12 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I looked a little further and saw that nl80211 does support changing > interface type (mode). But this driver (rtl8192ce) only supports > creating new interfaces, not changing their type. > > Should mac80211 drivers generally support cha

Bug#645055: realtek 8188CE ad-hoc mode not supported

On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:08:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Can you create an ad-hoc interface like this: > > iw dev wlan0 interface add wlan1 type adhoc > > (you'll need the iw package). Interesting - this works. Didn't know of the iw tool. But this creates a separate interface, kind of odd

Bug#645055: realtek 8188CE ad-hoc mode not supported

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.39-3~bpo60+1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hi, The documentation for the rtl8192ce driver explicitely mentions that it supports ad-hoc mode, yet, on the rtl8188CE card I have here (which is advertised as supported both by the upstream driver and the driver in the

Bug#597664: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Xorg crashes with radeon kernel messages

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:47:18 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Because it's been so long, I also should ask: > > - can you still reproduce this with recent sid and squeeze kernels? No, as the hardware is offline. > - any ideas, weird symptoms, or workarounds discovered since then? >How have

Bug#565225: don't assume RESUME partition will never change

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.93.4 Severity: normal With swap on lvm, /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume containing UUID prevented the system to resume changing back to dev/mapper (/dev/mapper/vg0-swap) allowed my system to resume from hibernate As my problem appears linked to this /etc /in

Bug#482387: iwl3945: please include the monitor mode patch.

. Could you apply this patch to the official Debian kernel, Thanks, Antoine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443407: Same bug on Samsung Q35 with an untainted kernel

esent. Antoine --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ===-+-=== module-init-tools (>= 0.9.13) | 3.3-pre11-4 i

Bug#309206: hal: Hald freezes my computer on startup

Markus Raab wrote: Now you know that it is a bug of the kernel, could you please try to reproduce it on a more recent kernel? With the actual 2.6.14 kernel, this bug has disappear. I think you can close the bug. Thank you, I have re-enabled my hal daemon. Antoine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#311357: Really a module problem

Hello The problem arised when I installed version 2.6.8-2 -116.i686 kernel... As I returned back to 2.6.8-1, the module 'via-rhine' is operating well. By _ Découvrez le nouveau Yah

Bug#311357: Also facing this problem...

d to change USB allocation (also on IRQ11), But nothing to do: this worked since 2001 Thanks for your help, I can give more informations if needed Kindly, Antoine Brunel _ Décou

Bug#306805: kernel-image-2.4.27-nubus cannot install because of wrong file name

Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-nubus Version: 2.4.27-4 Severity: normal dpkg error in the subprocess post-installation because this script looks for /boot/vmlinux-2.4.27-nubus where the actual file contained in the packet is /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.27-nubus doing a mv /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.27-nubus /boot/vm