ll enabled.
Do you still need that I remove the '/var/lib/alsa/asound.state'
configuration file in between two full boots? I will do, one day, regardless
of your answer, but I make no promise for when I will share my progress.
Still in contact ... co-Debianer, or not?
Deep Though
ault.
Once toggeled, everything functions very fine.
I'm not so sorry for the noise, cause this mis-feature is much of a trap,
indeed; hope you agree with me.
Thanks again, Jonathan.
Kind Regards,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers experim
seful.
Kind Regards,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-1-amd64 (Debian 3.2.7-1) (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org)
(gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-16) ) #1 SMP Tue Feb 28 15:35:32 UTC 2012
** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-1-amd64
root
Kind Regards,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-1-amd64 (Debian 3.2.7-1) (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org)
(gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-16) ) #1 SMP Tue Feb 28 15:35:32 UTC 2012
** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-1-amd64
root=UUID=33f
a bug of the
install system? By the time someone has initramfs-tools 0.94.4 , he/she
should have a "COMPRESS=gzip" stanza in the configuration file.
I appologize for not having seen the bug report #586554 before.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- Package-specific info:
-- initramfs siz
ot;/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf" before upgrading initramfs-tools from
version 0.94.4 to version 0.97 .
Note that it is strange that initramfs-tools 0.97 depends on the COMPRESS
variable to be set properly in "/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf", while
the 0.94.4 version d
Hello, the hurd,
davide wrote :
[...]
svn co svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-kbuild-2.6
Then, fetch the vanilla kernel tarball (important: the 2.6.x version,
no 2.6.x.y version):
wget http://ftp.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.27.tar.bz2
Now, you can prepare the pack
'false bug' since Xen is known not to support ACPI.
However it is embarrassing if keyboard and touchpad functions depend
effectively on proper OS-Side ACPI initialisation while the keyboard
can be used seamlessly to tell the boot loader what to boot.
In hope my report will prove u
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:13:21PM +0200, Valentin QUEQUET wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92e
Severity: normal
Hello all,
I witnessed this trouble with initramfs-tools 0.92f :
Boot process freezes on 'Activating swap:' message.
Instead, all is
Activating swap:' message.
Instead, all is fine with previous initramfs-tools version = 0.92e .
Under 0.92e, I can see the message : 'Activating swap: swapon on /dev/sda3'
In hope my report will prove useful.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- Package-specific info:
-- /proc/cmdline
#x27;Activating swap:' message.
Instead, all is fine with previous initramfs-tools version = 0.92e .
Under 0.92e, I can see the message : 'Activating swap: swapon on /dev/sda3'
In hope my report will prove useful.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- Package-specific info:
-- /proc/cm
:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10997
I also updated things on my WEB site (more log files, .config, ...):
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mandolosse/
Have a nice W.E.
regards
Valentin QUEQUET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Least but not last: I still experience bug #427421 (The FAMOUS
Linux/LILO/initRD case) with kernel
2.6.26~rc7-1~experimental.1~snapshot.11693 :-(
Help this report will prove useful.
Yours, sincerely.
Valentin QUEQUET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &quo
n early kernel panic with version 2) (see above) of my
initrd for linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 (ver 2.6.25-5) which is smaller ?
In hope my report will prove useful.
I'm looking forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
losse/logs/2008-06-23__dmesg__ehci_hcd__died.txt
I also captured 'scanimage', 'lsmod' output and snapshots of '/proc/interrupts'
at different times. I plan to scrutinize all this data, to comment the relevant
parts and to post them later.
In hope my report will pr
t, in the
Linux_Kernel/LILO/Initial_RAM_Disk case, be a moot point.
To your opinion, who's guilty ?
I don't necessarily want to make the case against Linux_Kernel
overflated ;-)
I'm looking forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
#x27;s just that the kernel might not detect the
good filesystem type of the initial RAM disk image.
It's clear that the problem is more complex, and I bet it is a
Kernel+LILO problem (like in the mythology of the Babel Tower).
I'm looking forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
prove useful.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR
ebian CUSTOMIZE [pristine] Linux
KERNEL.
I just throw a bottle into the sea.
In hope someone catch it...
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-tuned-toi (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-
f make-kpkg to 'ship' these
modules, instead of
further module-assistant invokation (I always used m-a)?
Help this report will prove useful.
Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
21 matches
Mail list logo
