On May 17, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Aron Xu (2015-05-17):
>> At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and
>> for zfs it's similar in the way of packaging though not uploaded yet.
>> What we have (code ready to go) is a mechanism that detects/gets
>> defini
On May 26, 2013, at 3:31 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Absolutely not acceptable. Out-of-tree modules must not hold up fixes
> to the kernel. It was bad enough when their build failures were
> blocking each other in linux-modules-extra-2.6.
So how much delay would be acceptable? One day? Twelve h
On May 25, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please show that CDDL does not impose additional restrictions over
> GPL-2.
Since you seem to have already settled the case once and for
all and are so sure about this, how about you prove your point?
It really doesn't matter who proves ther
On May 25, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> just use DKMS to build OOT modules at
> image generation time? Seems to be a good idea.
If setting up a kernel-build-system on one of the
Debian GNU/Linux servers isn't an option, then this
would be a second best..
Then it will be up to the user bui
On May 24, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
>>> What I can think of is to do the trick in d-i, since it already has
>>> the ability to retrieve and load udeb on the fly, and even prompt
>>> users for missing firmware.
>>
>> Maybe even build them using dkms? I saw that you can make d-i build
>> al
On May 24, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> and help d-i people to handle the brokenness
> if a change in kernel makes the OOT module does not build
This should only happen when a new major version of the kernel comes
out, which means it should only happen in unstable..
And we could make it so
On May 22, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Quoting from the report of our 2009 meeting,
> <20091015123106.ga16...@kyllikki.org>:
>> out of tree modules
>> ---
>>
>> After a somewhat involved discussion taking into account the FTP
>> masters extreme irritation about trying
On May 22, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Linux has plenty of fine filesystems to choose from already, so this is
> not a must-have.
Ohhh, ouch! But I'm not going to bite... :)
> Also, there are questions as to whether it would be legal.
Legal as in CDDL clashes with GPL you mean?
I'
8 matches
Mail list logo
