On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Results (on ext4) suggest that patches 1 and 4 matter and the rest are
> within noise. Timings are rough; sometimes replicates vary by as much
> as a second. Numbers are cold cache (i.e., after running sync and
> echo 3>.../drop_caches),
On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> It could be an e2fsck bug, or it could be a hardware issue. In my
> experience, every time
> I've tried digging into problems with e2fsck -fy not fixing all problems in a
> single
> pass, it's been a hardwa
On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Buehl, Reiner wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> I tried for a while with alternate hardware and the original controller but
> the error did never happen again. I think your idea of a bug in e2fsck's
> handling of multiply claimed blocks is the only explanation: Maybe during a
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:14:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a heads up for a major change in kernel-package, the
> tool to create user packaged kernel images and headers; which will
> make the make-kpkg script far less error prone, and far more
> deterministic.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
