On 01/07/2013 10:27 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Ted To wrote:
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
upgraded kernel linux-image-3.2.0-4 from prior version of 3.2.0-4
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was ef
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:13:02PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Currently the value reported for max_batch_time is really the
> value of min_batch_time.
>
> Reported-by: Russell Coker
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
Applied, thanks.
r seeks (although it will require a greater write
bandwidth). Depending on the write bandwidth, you really need to
benchmark things to be sure, though.
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
o I can
imagine adding some documentation that warns people not to use
data=journal unless they really know what they are doing, but at least
personally, I'm a bit reluctant to dispense with a bug report like
this by saying, "oh, that feature should be deprecated".
R
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:32:48PM -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>
> Ted, since this new iteration has no customer data, passwords, keys, or
> any other private data, I'm going to try to get approval to release an
> exact EC2 image of this system for you to test with, includin
100-120 stuck emails. After Postfix tried
> and failed to deliver a bunch of emails I would get the OOPS.
Yeah, what I'd probably try to do is install postfix and then send a
few hundred messages to foo...@example.com and see if I can repro the OOPS.
Thanks for investigating!
duce the problem on that base image it would be really
great! I have an Amazon AWS account; contact me when you have an
image you want to share, if you want to share it just with my AWS
account id, instead of sharing it publically...
- Ted
--
T
,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110403020227.ga19...@thunk.org
wrong answer. So at the very least I'd recommend having command
line options to enable/disable use of posix_fadvise().
Regards,
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
application programmers really wanted was O_PONY, with the magic pixie
dust. Unfortunately:
http://www.linuxformat.com/files/nopony.jpg
- Ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
et upgrade"), in that case the
POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED would probably be a good thing.
The reason why I suggested using sync_file_range() is because it is
very specifically directed at forcing the writeback to happen, which
is not quite the same thrust as posix_fadvise().
Regards,
NLY
shouldn't affect the mod time. Any opening of a file using O_RDONLY
touches the atime of the file (and all directories and symlinks needed
to open it), though so the use of O_NOATIME and fdatasync() to
minimize unneeded I/O does seem to be a good idea.
e is. :-)
But using this program on a file system composed of a 5400rpm laptop
drive running LVM and LUKS, I get:
mass-sync-tester -d:dpkg current: time: 0.83/ 0.01/ 0.00
versus
mass-sync-tester -n:dpkg fixed: time: 0.07/ 0.00/ 0.01
- Te
c); # assuming the file "c" does not yet exist
fsync(a.dpkg-new);
fsync(b);
fsync(c);
rename(a.dpkg-new, a);
... and then set the package status as unpacked.
I am guessing you are doing (a) today --- am I right? (c) or (d)
would be best.
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-486
Typing 'apmd' results in 'No APM support in kernel' and 'grep
APM /boot/config-2.6.18-6-486' gives:
# Power management options (ACPI, APM)
# APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS Support
CONFIG_APM=m
# CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
# CONFIG_APM_DO_ENA
rsist.
Thanks -- Ted Hilts
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
* Brian Almeida:
I've been unable to find an official debian kernel which has
Xen supporter after 2.6.18-5 (released with etch). While I realize
there were changes in later kernels
l and installed it, the vmlinux-2.6.22.9 will
not be accepted as "a valid ELF image".. Does anyone know what I'm
doing wrong?
I'm really stuck here, so if anyone can help please do.
ted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: important
The version 1.1.0 of ipw2100, which came with kernel 2.6.14-2-686
as a module, couldn't work with wpasupplicant because of several
known bugs listed in the driver's website. Those bugs had been
Let your child grow with the best software...
http://xmh.gnmgmc3b3am6ggyt3gytlggy.tranquil.com/?pslk
You don't get anything clean without getting something else dirty.
Afflicted by love's madness all are blind.
Practice, the master of all things.
Many things have fallen onl
Than you cannot even imagine what it is like to be a real man in bed!
http://nmsr.30ow7mle0d3bp43.bullionismia.com
Experience teaches only the teachable.
To each mortal peradventure earth becomes a new machine.
You can pray for someone even if you dont think God exists.
--
To
21 matches
Mail list logo
